BuzzerBeater Forums

België - I.1 > Seizoen 14 / Saison 14

Seizoen 14 / Saison 14

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
160142.35 in reply to 160142.34
Date: 10/30/2010 5:59:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I wouldn't mind facing a BBBL team, at my home ofcourse, this week.

most of my team has shape 9, especially the big guns, so it's my best shot at eliminating a strong opponent.


I can't help it but I HAVE to bring it up once more.:)
to yet again show the fact shape is optimal at minutes much lower then claimed in the forums:
Backaert was at 9 at the start of the season after having consecutive 48 minute weeks. Last week he dropped to 8 after having 61 minutes, this week he stayed at 8 after having 64 minutes. All this while Van Eeckhout on his turn now had consecutive weeks of 48 minutes and is at 9...
I know it can be coinsidence, but when you are noticing the same pattern season after season.... well... it's just hard to believe 55 to 65 min is the optimal amount.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
160142.39 in reply to 160142.38
Date: 11/5/2010 2:27:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
yeah

it's a really good test for my team
3 great games this week

my guards are ready for this challenge

This Post:
00
160142.42 in reply to 160142.35
Date: 11/10/2010 6:51:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
I wouldn't mind facing a BBBL team, at my home ofcourse, this week.

most of my team has shape 9, especially the big guns, so it's my best shot at eliminating a strong opponent.


I can't help it but I HAVE to bring it up once more.:)
to yet again show the fact shape is optimal at minutes much lower then claimed in the forums:
Backaert was at 9 at the start of the season after having consecutive 48 minute weeks. Last week he dropped to 8 after having 61 minutes, this week he stayed at 8 after having 64 minutes. All this while Van Eeckhout on his turn now had consecutive weeks of 48 minutes and is at 9...
I know it can be coinsidence, but when you are noticing the same pattern season after season.... well... it's just hard to believe 55 to 65 min is the optimal amount.



i consider 48 to 60 optimal, the close it is ot 48, the better it seems to be for me.

only problem is, you can't expect to ask the managers of NT players to limit the minutes of their players to around 48... for the U21, you might be able to do that (since salaries aren't that high yet ( save the C's of this season :P)), but for the NT ( when salaries are high) you'll need your players to preform and probably use them in 2 games a week (best case scenario is one game they are the starters, and second game, they start on the bench)

anyhow, i think that 48 should be the minimum and the closer that it is to 48, the better the GS will be.

This Post:
00
160142.44 in reply to 160142.43
Date: 11/10/2010 2:03:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
WEL,, I think there might be a little diffrence.
In the U21 it shouldn't be to hard to find a second player (of any age) that is about equal to the U21 player, and so rotation of the players and thus dividing minutes nicely shouldn't be a big issue.

for NT players, they often DO exceed the other players in the team, and the urge to let them play more minutes is bigger.

I know fully well nobody can ask managers to have their best and most paid player play fewer minutes.
All I try to do is to eliminate that pesky theory, that unstopable idea most have about how many minutes players should play each week as a MINIMUM, to get a good GS.
And I am glad you also noticed that closer to 48 is better.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
From: Coach Q
This Post:
00
160142.45 in reply to 160142.44
Date: 11/11/2010 3:15:14 PM
Basket Mizu Arlon
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
i can't believe sonics gambled tonight! and still won! that was a unique opportunity to eliminate him and i missed it... i'm frustrated big time!

Advertisement