BuzzerBeater Forums

You started to prove me that my HN>=2 is wrong...
And yes, when I give tip on forum I always try to give right tip.

Sorry, no. I gave a different opinion and explained why it was different with arguments. It's for everyone to read the thread, think for himself and form his opinion based on what he read.
I have not belittled you or your opinion and never tried to prove you wrong, I gave a different perspective, I don't want to prove you wrong.
You instantly started the stupid stuff, always 3 is better than 2 etc...

You don't have to apologize :)

That's where your problem is, not with handling. If you eliminate the OD condition,

And if I elimitate RB and ID condition I should find thousands players. However, I prefer to elimitate HN condition than other important conditions, including OD.

Are you telling me you wouldn't take a 9/9/9/1/9/9/ in the outside skills of your C?

I would take him. He would be one of the best balanced player in whole BB, on every level (depending on primaries), even on NT level. In fact C, who has every perimeter skill >=7 is rare and expensive. And C in Your example is better than C who has all perimeter skills = 7.

I prefer HN=2 because I don't like skills = 1. However in this case I would make compromise and get this guy even with skill = 1 because of beautiful other 5 secondaries. 100% perfect player doesn't exist so 99% perfect player is good choice.

better question would be something along the lines of "how many handling points is one big man skill point worth?"

In my first post in this topic I said how many points in whole match gives us one level of HN. If You know how many points give You one level of IS - automatically You have answer for Your question.

I generally don't have a minimum for handling. I view OD and PS as more important for a C,

It's the essence. There is no reason to think about HN for PF/C instead of OD or PS. You said exactly the same but in other words.

I should have kept that center in retrospect but I was down money and he was expensive. It allowed me to pick up a few other guys with the money that I got from him. I also have 3 inside guys I wanted to develop. I just dont quite understand why some guys shoot so much better or worse then others when their stats are similar

Hidden "aggressiveness" stat perhaps?
More likely to foul/draw fouls. More likely to pass on shot, or shoot.

[quote I just dont quite understand why some guys shoot so much better or worse then others when their stats are similar

This happens in real life too my friend.

When it comes to BigMen and Handling(and driving and passing) while playing LI and LP, here´s my take.

Even thou the two inside-tactics are nearly alike, there are a few things that differ.
Low Post requires more Handling on your big men to execute the tactics to the fullest.
I believe it´s because they post more, backing up a defender, make a move and shot.
While in Look Inside, the big men require more Passing.
This is because they kick the ball back out(passing the ball, not driving/dribble) if the don´t have a good opportunity to score.

I try to find(or train) Bigmen with atleast 5, but preferably 7+ in Handling and Passing.
But the ground rule is still, Handling>Passing you're better of running LP with your bigmen.
Passing > handling, you're better of running LI.

I think you can afford to lower your IS by one or two steps, if you can get Driving, Handling and perhaps passing up a few steps. He will be as efficient, maybe more, than a bigman with slightly higher IS but low skills in Handling/passing.

So the perfect TO is a young, "tall" PG with atleast Superstar potential that have high Passing and some Handling and Driving. Train his IS,ID and RB and round it all up with som 1on1 =) Add some OD and JS/JR and you might have yourself a NT-player =)

As always you cannot measure a single player just by his skillset, you need to look at his role on the Team.

my 19 years old PF trainee has 9 handling, I put him as a SF in last scrimmage (98085587), but still turned the ball over 4 times in the game.

Is he turnover-prone?

And golden shovel for u m8! Topic from 2012

That's pretty modest by HAHA's usual standard.