In all seriousness though I think you're underestimating Australia's U21 talent pool. Mahurkar's a great ball handler for a PF. McNicholas has Wonderful IS. Clarke is only listed SG because of his great rebounding for a guard. Prosser can score and/or pass in the post. And Rylance was an alright player in proficient game shape. And you say that you had better players in PG through PF, yet the matchup ratings suggest that we had the advantage in SF and PF.
I can't disclose all the skills of our players here, so if you want, I can send a few of them to your BB-mail and you will see what am I talking about. But anyway:
Mahurkar's a great ball handler for a PF.
It's still not enough against OD=12 unless he is powered up by much higher enthusiasm which you had.
McNicholas has Wonderful IS.
So does our 20y old who played at PF. Our PF was at Proficient with 600k+ DMI, while Mcnicholas was Strong-Low (240k DMI). Pretty huge difference I'd say.
Clarke is only listed SG because of his great rebounding for a guard.
RB has got nothing to do with it. Based on his salary and SG listing, I'd say the most PA he can have is 11-12. That's not that great against our PG with OD and PA 14, don't you think? But again, enthusiasm boosted him.
So if you take away the enthusiasm factor which boosted all your players, we definitely had advantage from PG through PF, given the game shape.