If anybody understands Mr. Glass’ attempt to distinguish between taxing players and taxing managers, please enlighten us all. There may be something useful there, but for the life of me I can’t make it out~
Its pretty simple to understand. we spend in the market , so why keep taking money away from what keeping the market afloat with a tax. When they do that you have to recoup that money spent. there's inflation in the market.. which is more money for good or bad player. . A lot thing don't need bidding cost like trainers.
Tax the market if a manager has sold 75 player in half a season. Make the market charge him more every week of the season not per player but every week of the season. If come back and sells 75 more the second half. tax the market in player inflation sales the market has to adjust to much selling coming from one point. Those who sell less players will get more market value per sale than those who sell a lot. keep record of manager who selling so many players. tax the market for everybody, training for exempt is abusing the market.
Unique player should be worth more than common. Say for example a Princeton player would be worth more than a Li player because Li is more common. That not the case for what you get with a Unique player all he is worth is peanuts in the market.
Last edited by Mr. Glass at 2/3/2015 5:19:09 PM