BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Giving up and setting a TIE agreement

Giving up and setting a TIE agreement

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
64255.35 in reply to 64255.33
Date: 1/23/2009 7:33:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
if you TIE and lose (fans hate lackluster performances), there should be a penalty in terms of your fan support. Maybe this could be counter-acted by CT's or something, but add to the fan survey


I agree with that

if both people TIE, then the enthusiasm bonus should be halved or even something more dramatic.


Not possible because both managers could have TIE without informing each other in order to improve their enthusiasm. When both teams have TIE it does not automatically mean that it was a pre-arranged TIE!

This Post:
00
64255.36 in reply to 64255.35
Date: 1/23/2009 10:39:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137


if both people TIE, then the enthusiasm bonus should be halved or even something more dramatic.


Not possible because both managers could have TIE without informing each other in order to improve their enthusiasm. When both teams have TIE it does not automatically mean that it was a pre-arranged TIE!


I guess I don't see that as a problem.


Steve
Bruins

This Post:
00
64255.37 in reply to 64255.36
Date: 1/23/2009 10:47:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
because people get an disadvantage, because of the setting of the opponent ...

So a player is in advance when he play tie vs a bot, instead of tieing against an real league opponent who also tie.

This Post:
00
64255.38 in reply to 64255.37
Date: 1/23/2009 12:15:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
because people get an disadvantage, because of the setting of the opponent ...

So a player is in advance when he play tie vs a bot, instead of tieing against an real league opponent who also tie.


I understand that. I just feel that BuzzerBeater needs to move towards player development, basketball tactics & strategy and sound financial decision making as the major paths to success...not an enthusiasm management system that isn't really reflective of the game of basketball. Again, that's my opinion.


Steve
Bruins

This Post:
00
64255.39 in reply to 64255.38
Date: 1/23/2009 1:25:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
it is no really reflecting the basketball game, even if NBA teams share are bit of their power during the regular season too ;) But this have more to do do, with holding a good "fitness".

But i also thinks that this enthusiams system is a funny part of tactics and strategy.

From: Kzarik

To: Ehud
This Post:
00
64255.40 in reply to 64255.1
Date: 1/23/2009 1:41:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I am definitely against limiting a manager's choice in the matter. In many cases playing normal against a hopelessly better opponent is ridiculously dumb.

This Post:
00
64255.41 in reply to 64255.40
Date: 1/28/2009 2:09:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I am definitely against limiting a manager's choice in the matter. In many cases playing normal against a hopelessly better opponent is ridiculously dumb.


Couldnt agree more. I had the top three opponents from my div in a row on my shcedule. I played my best 5 and did a CT and still lost by 20. With the two top teams now ahead, and my enthusiasm low the only wise choice for my team was to TIE. Kind of like the washington generals do vs the globetrotters.

This is also a valuable strategy when freshly promoted. If you dont want to go right back down you might TIE all the best teams and norm/ct the teams you have a chance against. I guess you could valiantly march your high school team in to play the Lakers every time, and pep talk your heart out. Probably yield the same result.

This Post:
00
64255.42 in reply to 64255.41
Date: 1/29/2009 10:12:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
If we are going to punish managers who risk a TIE, or who make a tactical choice by setting a TIE, then we are better off deleting the whole enthousiasm system.

That's all I have to say to that.

Last edited by Lord of Doom at 1/29/2009 10:13:26 AM

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
64255.43 in reply to 64255.42
Date: 2/2/2009 12:48:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Perhaps it is a question of semantics. If the wording were changed to say...

TIE= Normal
Normal= Crunch Time
Crunch Time= Life or Death

or some variation

Would that make it seem more realistic?

This Post:
00
64255.44 in reply to 64255.43
Date: 2/4/2009 3:06:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Life or Death? Is it supposed to be a Kermit Washington resemblance? Than a good level doctor would be needed.

But i got your point, it could be like Normal - Play hard - Crunch time! but I think managers are used to TIE-Normal-CT and it would cause a confusion in discussions. You would have to use three completely new terms instead of using old ones for something else than it is used now. Maybe a good suggestions for translation.

Last edited by docend24 at 2/4/2009 3:07:21 PM

This Post:
00
64255.45 in reply to 64255.44
Date: 2/4/2009 6:24:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Life or Death? Is it supposed to be a Kermit Washington resemblance? Than a good level doctor would be needed.



We could call it MurderBall.....or.......BuzzerBattle!


But i got your point, it could be like Normal - Play hard - Crunch time! but I think managers are used to TIE-Normal-CT and it would cause a confusion in discussions. You would have to use three completely new terms instead of using old ones for something else than it is used now. Maybe a good suggestions for translation.


Just a question of semantics. If I were struggling with the term 'take it easy' I would just remind myself that the lowest effort level doesnt have to mean 'barely show up'.