wonder if Jolly is worthy of consideration at all. Or is he redundand if Chacon is in good GS? Kearns would be in if LPP was actoive and his GS was good.
Jolly and Chacon aren't similar at all. But, Jolly might be a step behind after another look. Might be better as a call-up if he receives continued training. Chacon looks pretty solid except for the one big weakness in an important unnamed skill, then it's just a question of his gameshape under new ownership. I think Kearns would've reluctantly had to make the NT too if LPP was active. Now it's less likely since it'll be hard to call up a 35 y/o weeks into the season.
Hmm, what about Spadaro? I know he has small potential but he might be one of the best Li Sg we have (kind of sad but true)
I overlooked Spadaro. Personally, I disagree with the notion he'd be a capable inside SG but like him at SF. Gaudreault, though, is Spadaro's closest comparable and Gaudreault just seems better and more versatile, especially with our current lack of outside presence. Or, you could just take Spadaro since it's your decision.
If we really wanted to go the inside LI SG route, I think Hudgins might be best off shifting to SG. We'd still have Hall and one of Gaudreault/Spadaro/Bradshaw along with Worley for SF.
Don't want to influence you, but for the sake of a 12-man team for an extreme inside offence... something like:
Stronks(31)/Guevin(6)/Chacon(6)/Ferguson(5)
Hudgins(32)/Guevin(14)/Gaudreault(2)
Hall(32)/Gaudreault(12)/Worley(4)
Sammons(33)/Laurent(11)/Worley(4)
Collin(27)/Laurent(19)/Arsenault(2)
Of course, that wouldn't happen as long as blank line-up exists. But I doubt Spadaro would play much at guard in blank line-up either.
Last edited by Stajan at 10/27/2014 5:01:43 PM