BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Analyzing pops in Cross-training!

Analyzing pops in Cross-training!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
192339.355 in reply to 192339.354
Date: 9/29/2011 9:26:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
By firing such players I'm afraid they will vanish - players under 5k don't get enlisted if they're fired or "retired" with their team. I think a lot of people are doing this and less and less such players will be in circulation. That's why I'm holding onto my scrubs instead of firing them each week and replacing them. When their abilities will start to deteriorate, their wage will go under 1k so they will be "affordable"

This Post:
00
192339.356 in reply to 192339.353
Date: 9/29/2011 9:28:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
We still should try to find two cross pops in one week in one team. (afaik nobody reported two cross pops, am I right?)
Then we could create more hypotheses (and reject others).
Maybe always only one player in team receives cross training? (Without confirmed two pops we can't reject this hypothesis).

This Post:
00
192339.357 in reply to 192339.355
Date: 9/29/2011 9:42:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
I think a lot of people are doing this and less and less such players will be in circulation

You're right, but currently I think we still have enough scrubs in circulation ;-)
I made my hunting only in two days. I bidded ~50 (maybe ~70, for sure not more) players with parameters: 18-19yo, price=1k, potential>=6 and I bought 27 of them. After every draft we should have the same number of these players.

Keeping them in squad would be better for experiment, because if they received cross training then in next week they would have more chances for visible pop. But it has no sence for team which doesn't use team training.
If more than one player receive cross training, earlier or later we must find two cross pops. And it would be insteresting (we could have two pops in the same skill or in different skills, this information would be huge step to discover cross training).

This Post:
00
192339.358 in reply to 192339.357
Date: 9/29/2011 9:48:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
After every draft we should have the same number of these players.


Right, I forgot about that.

Keeping them in squad would be better for experiment, because if they received cross training then in next week they would have more chances for visible pop. But it has no sence for team which doesn't use team training.


Also true. I guess someone should do few consecutive weeks of team training. I will do it for sure because I can save money from trainer's salary who I would of course fire for the time being (for example 2 weeks of FT+2 weeks of ST). But I won't do it for at least one more season, so...let's hope there are some others who will do it sooner!

This Post:
00
192339.359 in reply to 192339.356
Date: 9/29/2011 10:00:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
We still should try to find two cross pops in one week in one team. (afaik nobody reported two cross pops, am I right?)
Then we could create more hypotheses (and reject others).
Maybe always only one player in team receives cross training? (Without confirmed two pops we can't reject this hypothesis).

As far as I've seen, no, only one guy in the team seems to get the cross training, and in only one skill. But I think these are excellent points, and until we know for certain otherwise, we have to assume it's possible. At this point, we really don't know if cross training just effects one random skill, or if it has a "blanket" effect over all the skills of a player (spreading the 10% loss over all skills not trained).

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
11
192339.360 in reply to 192339.356
Date: 9/29/2011 11:12:16 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
I don't have time to go back through whole the thread at the moment. But I'm almost sure that there was at least once or twice reported 2 different cross pops in one team during one training.

This Post:
00
192339.361 in reply to 192339.360
Date: 9/29/2011 1:58:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I don't have time to go back through whole the thread at the moment. But I'm almost sure that there was at least once or twice reported 2 different cross pops in one team during one training.


On same player? I checked every post and I don't recall that...

This Post:
00
192339.362 in reply to 192339.361
Date: 9/29/2011 2:08:21 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
no, different players but same team, I was reacting to B.B. King, he didn't wrote about one player but same team

Last edited by rwystyrk at 9/29/2011 2:09:02 PM

This Post:
00
192339.363 in reply to 192339.360
Date: 9/29/2011 4:47:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I don't have time to go back through whole the thread at the moment. But I'm almost sure that there was at least once or twice reported 2 different cross pops in one team during one training.

You're right: (192339.234)

And it was the third post in the thread during the first week cross training went live, so it couldn't have been two weeks lumped together. So, that answers that question.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
Advertisement