BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Staff Prices out of control

Staff Prices out of control

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
160648.36 in reply to 160648.34
Date: 10/15/2010 11:06:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
First off, you'd have to be talking a level 7 trainer to go from 18k to 70k in 56 weeks. Good luck with getting one of those for $350,000.

Second off, your scenario is all well and good, but you're not saving a level $6k per week.

- For the first 28 weeks of the two scenarios, you're the same.
- In the midst of the 28th week, the second scenario has a $385k outlay that puts it behind the first scenario.
- Over the remaining 28 weeks, the second scenario saves $17-20k per week.
- So the 2nd scenario makes you *WORSE OFF* than the first scenario from week 28 to week 45 -- over a full season that you've blown money down the tubes in order to chase a longer term return. If your team is set up so that you can deal with having $400k invested for a full season before you clear that money back and start actually banking profit, then yeah, replacing at $35k makes sense. But then that gets right back to the break-even analysis, which would say for the "do I pay $350k to replace my $35k L7 trainer with an $18k L7 trainer" decision -- yes, as long as you're willing to wait 17 weeks for payback otherwise hold the current trainer for longer.

Not every team is in a situation where they can look at money on a multiple-season position. If I blow $400k+ on a staff member now, that's money I can't use for a player to keep me from relegating or to make the playoffs or win some games in the playoffs. Maybe $400k isn't much, but when you multiply that by 3 staff members and consider that over 97% of the USA playerbase is in d.III or lower (adjust for your country, but only 80 players per country are in d.I or d.II), then yeah, the payback analysis is a perfectly valid method and probably more valid for the majority of situations.



From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
160648.37 in reply to 160648.35
Date: 10/16/2010 4:01:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I'm also comparing current salary and new trainer salary. Usually I try to change the trainer every season. Buy new trainer, wait 14 weeks, start to look for a new one (check every 3 days for a potential candidate). Usually it's impossible to find a trainer under 30k salary that is profitable with their signing fee.

This Post:
00
160648.38 in reply to 160648.34
Date: 10/16/2010 4:15:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
We do not have to argue about when how long anyone wants to keep their new trainer. People who want to keep their trainer for 56 weeks are welcome to go for those 18k salary trainers. Noone actually waits until their trainer goes to 70k salary and then sign a new 18k salary trainer to profit in 7 weeks. I just gave the numbers, what the salary has to be for it to be profitable for me to change into 18k salary player with 350k signing fee. In reality I actually look for a higher salary replacement (than 18k) because their signing fee is around 25k -> thus making it more profitable for my team in 7 weeks compared to my current trainers salary.
Everyone is free to choose their profit period. With game and prices changing pretty fast in BB, I feel commiting to any staff member for more than 1 season is not the best path to follow.
NB! You said something about, the same mambojumbo for all 3 staff members. That is not really true. LVL5 doctor and PR-guy are really cheap. Changing them seasonly is really easy. I got a speciality doctor with 16945 salary for 12k signing fee this season. Speciality PR-guy with 18223 salary for 4k signing fee. You just need some patience. So the trainer is the only one people are throwing money at.

This Post:
00
160648.39 in reply to 160648.36
Date: 10/16/2010 12:42:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Yep, there was definitely something off with my math. That's what I get for taking 5 minutes to look at problems!

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager