BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Trainees - 18 Bigmen

Trainees - 18 Bigmen

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
261712.36 in reply to 261712.31
Date: 8/4/2014 4:16:08 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14021402
Why do people only focus on 1 aspect (a negative one yes) of a 2-3 zone? Yes there will be some more uncontested passes, but certainly not all of them. If you give up say 10 extra shots uncontested, but on the other end you're able to defend the other 40 shots 50% better, then overall you have a better defense. On top of that you get more rebounds too.

I'm just pulling numbers out of my sleeve and I know they're not accurate, but it's to give an example that you need to look at the total picture. There hasn't been much research to accurately tell if the 2-3 zone is indeed a good option in certain matches, but I wouldn't dismiss it solely because there's a downside to it. It could very well be that the benefits outweigh the extra uncontested FG's.

This Post:
00
261712.37 in reply to 261712.35
Date: 8/4/2014 6:02:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Me personally I don't like to assume to much , Because when you assume its most likely wrong in a cartain way. I we can create a theory of that.. I reduces FG%.. A lot fo factors will be playing a part in that too.

I saw a guard player on the market like that , I think you or the other managers was discussing about having a very little Jr./r and sb and defense skills a few comment back. Those players are perfect for 2-3 zone./LI type of style of play.


Sb can work depends on who your facing. I think you still need some ID to make I more effective. Guard with Sb?? That's a new way of play. Its not hard to find that kind of player . some manager mess up youth and scrap him for cheap.