BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
93604.360 in reply to 93604.358
Date: 7/28/2009 9:46:15 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I think you should look over a larger sample of games before you conclude there is a bug... I did extensive testing on the new GE directly comparing the same games on both the old and new GE, on average there are definitely more blocks, though there is always noise...

note your analysis is looking at a new game and comparing it to other games... I can't say for sure that blocks would have been >0 in the old GE EVERY TIME. But I'm not going to be convinced there is a bug unless I see a convincing pattern over multiple games.


Last edited by BB-Forrest at 7/28/2009 9:46:35 AM

From: Marot
This Post:
00
93604.361 in reply to 93604.360
Date: 7/28/2009 9:54:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
I was posting it because somehow it was shocking for me to see 0 blocks with the new GE,where it was supposed that shotblocking will be more important. Anyway i have checked some games and more or less the effect of shotblocking it seems to be the same.

PD: kozlodoev: yes some of our centers are good on blocking

This Post:
00
93604.362 in reply to 93604.360
Date: 7/28/2009 10:22:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
did you change the blocking behaviour, after the first release of the new GE at the beginningodf the season?

This Post:
00
93604.363 in reply to 93604.359
Date: 7/28/2009 10:25:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/boxscore.aspx?MatchID=6763

First game with te new GE in national teams and Spain for first time in this season did 0 BLOCKS. Is thereany bug or im missing something? Because in theory with the new GE blocking had to be more important no?

Shotblocking is more important -- which doesn't automatically lead to heaps of block. I've no idea about the NT player skills, but club teams have historically ignored the development of Shot blocking to save on the salary of their centers.


what that for a curious logic? To make it more important, you had to pay even more salary for the same amount of blocks?

Even when it wasn't worthful, to raise it in the old syystem even for a small amount if you doesn' believe on the side effect in defence which only was an myth.

This Post:
00
93604.365 in reply to 93604.364
Date: 7/28/2009 11:12:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I don't have any concerns about how my centers have performed in the two new GE games. Either way, from a calibration point of view, world-class shotblockers average maybe 3.5 a game anyhow.


Thats right BUUUUUUUUT, a world class shot blocker will affect 4-5 shots into a game with his presence. For me a good blocker doesn't means that he get muchblocks, it is an essentiell think in defence.

For example Kirilenko, has when he is "coming out" an impressive amounts of blocks but in my eyes he wasn't a good blocker because he jumped up to much and often gives a easy basket because of this behaviour.

And when it wasn't worth to train 3 skill shot blocking for a half block, why it should reasonable to train "5" for the same amount.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/28/2009 11:13:00 AM

This Post:
00
93604.367 in reply to 93604.366
Date: 7/28/2009 11:29:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Thats right BUUUUUUUUT, a world class shot blocker will affect 4-5 shots into a game with his presence. For me a good blocker doesn't means that he get muchblocks, it is an essentiell think in defence.

Right, that is why the BBs have previously mentioned in the forums that SB is included in the determination of team's inside defenses (though it is not as important as ID).


yeah but they also said, that it doesn't affect the ID(lower the percentages of unblocked shot) and the only result of the skill if a skill is blocked or not.

This post you mean, was misleading many players.

This Post:
00
93604.369 in reply to 93604.362
Date: 7/28/2009 12:02:05 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I did, it has been retuned.

From: docend24

This Post:
00
93604.370 in reply to 93604.361
Date: 7/28/2009 12:08:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Ever heard of altered shots?

Advertisement