BuzzerBeater Forums

You just asked me how to improve the inside attack, so I was answering that. But it seems that there is not a good answer for you about this subject.
The model of team that you employed in the B3 on season 9 is not working anymore, so the sooner you find a new model, the sooner you will get competitive again with an inside focus.
But even in season 9 with the old game engine, you would not have gone very far in the spanish or italian cup which are much stronger competitions than the B3, and I have not forgotten yet that at the end of season 9 the HCA had to be reduced at high skill levels because the effect was too strong, and it looks like you played all the B3 games at home.

Anyway I don´t want to go further with this discussion. I have already told what I wanted to say. Good luck.

When you say "tactic", you probably mean "look inside, run&gun, motion...", what is a poor concept of tactic. This "tactic" is not so important in BuzzerBeater. It is just a limited model for the simulation of the "pace" and "focus" in real basket.

Yes, that's what I call tactic and, again, it should be more important imho.

But "Tactic" (with capital letter) is something much wider than just setting "look inside" and set a line-up with 3 centers. This "Tactic" involves the design of players with training according to your long-term strategy.

I call this strategy and, as I have already stated here (125704.252), that's the probably the reason why I am still playing this game.

I may be wrong but I have the feeling that some users who don´t fully understand how the GE works, are trying to promote GE changes on the basis of a very simple view of the game: tactics and ratings. My apologies if I´m wrong, but that's my feeling from reading this long debate thread.

If after 344 posts you still think so this discussion has been a total failure.

The goal of the game is to build a succesful team and make it work better than the others.

We are still talking two different languages. The goal of the game, at least for me, is having fun. Winning helps, no doubts about that, but it is not all.
If I complain about tactics is because after so many season I am bored of playing r&g 80% of the games and LI the other 20%. And I am bored of playing m2m another 80% of the games and 3-2 defense 20 or so %.

All you say about building a team and players with the right skillset to optimize a tactic is correct and everybody has a different view about how to do that. But in the end, no team (or very few) can have two very competitive starting lines, one for inside and one for outside focus. Being able to successfully play the weaker offense (mainly by surprising the opponent) would help to give more variety to this game.
In fact, I assume that what keeps managers from playing most of the times the same tactics and lineup is the game shape management.

It's also true that with the new game engine there are more tactical options (for example Princeton is not as useless as it used to be). But it'is false that nobody cared before. For me, there was more balance between r&g and LI, but the limited usability of most of the other tactics has always been an issue.
That's enough from me.

Btw, yesterday the GE punished me for all I am saying in this thread and made me lose with a 3-2 defense against a LI with awful OF :D (17980002).

I can hardly get bored with run&gun and look inside, because they are not my favourite tactics:

S11 Offense: Run and Gun 7, Princeton 4, Motion 3, Base Offense 2, Patient 1
S10 Offense: Motion 16, Push the Ball 3, Run and Gun 3, Princeton 2, Look Inside 1, Base Offense 1
S9 Offense: Motion 11, Base Offense 4, Run and Gun 3, Push the Ball 2, Look Inside 2, Princeton 2
S8 Offense: Run and Gun 8, Motion 8, Push the Ball 7, Base Offense 2, Princeton 1
S7 Offense: Motion 8, Push the Ball 6, Run and Gun 6, Base Offense 4, Look Inside 1...

(thanks to oeuftete for his prospectus tool).

This is my sixth season in the spanish first division and my worst season I made 5th position. So I don´t think playing Run&Gun and LookInside are strictly necessary to be competitive.

There are alot of Post on this one, so please forgive me if someone else has already brought this up. Push the Ball seems to be the best Tactic, most BBB Finals have been won playing this way & your coach will play to where the team is having the most success

i wouldn't sign this, pretty few of important NT matches are played this way, and i see a lot of looses by team who i see better then their opposition and playing like that.

Normally is it a strategy, where you make few faults but if you risk a bit and set your offense right you gain a bonus.

These are example of games you played this season with princeton, base offence and patient
(17958838), (19919995), (19959921).
Breathtaking!
You know better than me that when you have a tight game you almost always chose either r&g or motion, but for some reasons I do not understand you prefer to deny it.

Last edited by Newton07 at 1/27/2010 10:34:55 AM

Well,maybe this game has something to tell us: (19984603)

If I complain about tactics is because after so many season I am bored of playing r&g 80% of the games and LI the other 20%. And I am bored of playing m2m another 80% of the games and 3-2 defense 20 or so %.

My post was an answer to your previous post where you seem to say that Look Inside and Run and Gun are the only options.
The last seasons I have played mainly Motion, not Run & Gun, not Look Inside, and I´m not a dead team. That is what I wanted to say.

And what about this (15519685) and this (15519593), last season?

My team last season was designed for Motion, and this season I have got better skill to play Run & Gun effectively. I am not "married" with a tactic, I play the best option for my team.

And with other spanish teams: What about this of season 9 (with the new GE): (15328404), or this (17679894), or this (17679895), or this (15519558), or this (17962076). Where is the supposed weakness of the inside focus?

None of the outside players in the losing teams have low OD, on the contrary they are good outside defenders.
You are probably talking about the OD team rating which is not directly involved in determining the match outcome. And of course, your idea would also work on the other side. The inside team OD is also making a double role: decreasing the quality of the shots taken by the outside team and preventing them to pass the ball each other. So finally, following your argument we have arrived to a nice and "unexpected" conclusion... : Inside teams need to have good outside defense to be competitive. Fantastic! ;-)

And I would add that good passing would make them much stronger towards the 3-2 zone. And if their C and PF have good passing skill, then who will stop them passing the ball each other? An outside team would need to train OD for their C and PFs?

Finally, I don´t know any "cheap" outside team. Maybe you buy players in another transfer list, because I think a good PG with a nice level of passing, jump shot, jump range and outside defense is not what I'd call "cheap".