BuzzerBeater Forums

1. One of the biggest obstacles we face in developing quality NT players is how expensive they are. One area of concern the new training presents is that the random factor could make it more difficult to keep costs down by specifically training the ratings the trianing, and only the ratings they are training. For instance, right now, if we train OD, we know that it sub trains Driving, Handling, and Inside defense to a lessser extent. Well, as we have discussed, high level NT players are very expensive. Its diffiucult to have one of these players, and have a solid roster to compete in league play as well. So if a team owner is focusing on defense, already concerned about the rising salary of that player, an in addition to the OD pop they aer going after, they get a Jump Range pop...it could be very costly.

Judging by how the salary formula works, I do not agree with this. If a Center pops in Jump Range it will have literally 0 impact on the salary and vice versa for guards. Similarly, the salary formula is calculated based on sublevels so little green arrows do not matter.

In my example, I assumed it was obvious I was speaking of a guard. And In fact, if you are wanting an OD pop, and do not want anymore JR pops, this new training system will impact the players salary. And like you said, this is the case, whether you get a pop or not. Its not matter of just the arrows, its the sub levels. So if the mystery random bonus traning happens to be JR of a guy who is already high in JR, that would add more expense to his salary even if he didnt actually pop in JR. And in this example, if you werent wanting any more JR pops for that guy, but the mystery random training was for JR that week (which is totally out of our control) then it will affect the players salary.

The question was "how would you allocate them to best suit OUR team's needs?" I'm concerned that you answered with a player that best suits YOUR team's needs.

Actually I did....I read it as YOUR not OUR.....My bad :-(

Last edited by Jason at 7/29/2011 1:19:45 AM

Also, you should be proud of the success you've had. But be careful comparing your teams success to others. You're assuming they're playing the game for the same reasons you are. Oriole is training one of the best 20 year old bigs we have in the pipeline, and, potential permitting, could make the U21 team next season.

Sure he may have come across a bit rude, but he did have a valid point. I'll try to make it clearer:

Namssor has been active on the offsite, especially in the tactics debate threads and opponent scouting. He has seen what has and has not worked in the past. He understands nuances that you may not be familiar with yet. Being a member of the offsite won't help you with your club team. But you're not running for manager of your club team. Being a member of the offsite will absolutely help with learning about the nuances of the NT. If we play a blank lineup, Namssor has a feel for what the GE will do with certain players. It may be beneficial to set some positions and leave others blank. The learning curve will be steeper. Fortunately, that's what the first round of America's is for. Good luck.

I totally understand that. And Oriolekid and I had a BBmail exchange this morning...we are cool

Here is the thing....I don't have specific experience as NT coach, but that doesnt mean I wouldn't be great at it. I don't have time on the Forum that a lot of people do, but it doesnt mean I won't thrive on it. All i can do is speak of what I have accomplished in this game, and what I know I am capable of. I have no doubt that Namssor is qualified....everyone keeps making a big deal of his time on the site, and how important it is. Clearly, there is a lot about this job, that can be learned from the site. At the same time, when it comes to being involved with the community, and bringing people together...He's had 70 posts since January of 2009. Barely over 2 a month. So all i can, do is speak to this belief that that the forum is so important, (I believe it is) is to show all of the things i have done in other community settings, and with my team, and promise to bring that same intensity to the NT program.

Last edited by Jason at 7/29/2011 2:20:58 AM

ok, no problem there. Thanks for clearing it up. That confusion might also have contributed to Rambo's narcissistic comment earlier.

Here is the thing....I don't have specific experience as NT coach, but that doesnt mean I wouldn't be great at it. I don't have time on the Forum that a lot of people do, but it doesnt mean I won't thrive on it. All i can do is speak of what I have accomplished in this game, and what I know I am capable of. I have no doubt that Namssor is qualified....everyone keeps making a big deal of his time on the site, and how important it is. Clearly, there is a lot about this job, that can be learned from the site. At the same time, when it comes to being involved with the community, and bringing people together...He's had 70 posts since January of 2009. Barely over 2 a month. So all i can, do is speak to this belief that that the forum is so important, (I believe it is) is to show all of the things i have done in other community settings, and with my team, and promise to bring that same intensity to the NT program.

I completely agree with all of that. I don't think any reasonable person could argue that you would not be a great choice for NT manager. I don't doubt for a minute that you will thrive in the NT community, whether you win this election or not. Just trying to convey the point that was made earlier.

From what's being said here it seems that the consensus from all the candidates is that a main obsticle to success is the lack of a 18/18/18ish big man. And that such a big man is not likely to be trained in the near future since foreign owners don't want to train the prospects, and USA I.1 is too competative for an owner to take on the financial risk and train such a player.

So, let's say that, without a big dollop of luck, such big men will not be a reality for the team anytime soon. My question to the candidates is,
1) What are the ideal G / SF prototypes to cover/compliment for our existing frontcourt deficiancies?
2) If such players don't exist now, how would you encourage their training by U21 grads or others so that they exist a few seasons down the line?

1. i think the real is asnwer is to improve the deficiencies, not just compliment them. I am not sure any type of G/SF is going to make our big man problems go away,or make it so its not a concern anymore. So the real issue , is to address the bigs.

2. I think the program is moving in this direction. The more community we have involved, and more success we have, the more you will see people wanting to be a part of this. And in some cases, make sacrifices. There are guys who have been playing this game since nearly the beginning. Some of them are getting tired, or burned out, and looking for a new challenge. That is why we see so many top level coaches do massive rebuilding projects. Perhaps some of them would be rejuvinated not by tearing down and dropping down to dIII or even DV, but maybe we could get 1, or 2, of them to commit to training these players for our future team. Or maybe some of them could buy the expensive players and keep training them into the machines we need them to be. I know this sounds easier said than done, but it only takes 1 or 2. I would start a committee for this purpose. If we talk to enough guys, and get their attention before they get too deep into their own rebuilding plans, maybe we could accomplish this. Again, 4 or 5 of these would be great, but it only takes one or two to make a real impact!

Last edited by Jason at 7/29/2011 4:17:58 AM

I think I have a Guard that has potential to be on the U21 team and possibly the NT in a few season. I am looking for some help training him and all that good stuff. So if you would like to give nme week by week advice with this just bbmail me

You can't be serious.

There is no other way for people to get to know me, have confidence in me, than showing my successes as a BB team owner.

I'm not sure this requires a response.

In part 2 of your post, you even ask my opinion, of my old league mate USA Elite...So even you recognize that my worthiness, or lack of is largely about my team and whats its done.

That is not what I was implying and only further strengthens my points. This is not about your club team. USA-Elite deploys a unique strategy that has shown tremendous success (something you were nice enough to point out to me when I asked). I was asking you to comment on it and discuss if it is practical on a larger scale.

Long story short, I have a tremendous amount of respect for you as a manager. However, your arguments haven't been able to bridge the gap between talking about your experience and talking about applying your experience to the NT. I think you know how to build a great team but I'm not sure you know what specific gaps we have in our team and what specific challenges we are going to face in a typical week. At least I don't think you've shown it.

Last edited by Rambo at 7/29/2011 9:25:28 AM

And now we Have a SF!

Thank you for your vote.