1. We are nowhere near the top 3. It was proven in last world cup in games against Finland and Hong Kong (and we had max enth).
"proven" ???
We used less effort and lost by 7 against Hong Kong. We also used a dreadful offence (21 missed threes). We were also without Hall and Hudgins due to awful gameshape. Combine the horrendous offence we used with the personnel we were without (2 of our only 3 inside iso players) and that's proof that we were better than Hong Kong. We stood a 100% chance of winning with an inside offence. Even if we didn't nail both GDP, I think we were better than them.
Against Finland we didn't have Hall at all and had overall much worse GS (Hudgins, etc). With Hall at SF, Stronks at guard, and Hudgins splitting time at both positions, that changes things. Um, also, their listed guards scored 54 points in 83 minutes. There's no way that's reasonable. Stronks never scores like that -- and if he did, he and Hudgins would be an unstoppable tandem at PG and SG in their own right.
France, we throw that game out the window. They hit GDP and used more effort, we missed GDP. We had no Hall or Hudgins. I think France was the worst team in the group.
We only won by 13 against Czech Republic. It wasn't that small a margin for any reason other than luck. They scored better than they should've against our insane defence. Not a good game to dissect.