Either way, since no-one has bothered to check whether there is some relationship between height and the initial distribution of skills (quite easy to do, by the way), I don't see how we can talk about changing it already.
i don't say it everytime for fun, there is a clearly distribution and most of the player with "good" initial skills, have the "right" hight.
Yesterday i checked it or the Xth time, and there was 141 P<g below 1.85, with 18 years(no training) and at least 3000$ salary but just four centers.
i also see this everytime in the draft who i draft fr the the german NT, where you don't see promising players with the total wrong hight(ok some of them, but them usually with the 1.9X, which isn't totally wrong) and most of the 2.20+ players have lots of 1 in the top 6 skills.
Uhm, you shouldnť make a cenzus of only 3k or higher - i know you did this for nt reasons and this is only side effect - but to get reaosnable regard form height distribution perspective all players should be includid no matter how low their salary is. Cause those small centers are center because they are genrally quite bad, but have at least one quite high inside skill which makes them centers (although they are really good rebounding guards or something like that). With 3k salary cenus you miss player who are small but are SF (or other non guardish position) but since they donť have expensive skills (salary wise) high they are cheaper than 3k. So you get quite unproper results for height distribution analysis. Similar way yo uwould get inaccurate results for tall players (I guess it would show less guards with the 3k cenzus)