BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Awesome New Draft Prospects

Awesome New Draft Prospects

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
216430.38 in reply to 216430.37
Date: 5/17/2012 8:24:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
wasn't aware, sorry

This Post:
00
216430.39 in reply to 216430.30
Date: 5/17/2012 5:07:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Can i get some feedback on my draftee


1st season: 6 weeks of 1 on 1 for PG/SG, then OD until the end. Between two-games week, train 1 on 1.
2nd season: 4 weeks of 1 on 1 for PG/SG, 4 weeks of OD, 6 weeks of PA.
3rd season: 2 weeks of 1 on 1 for PG/SG, OD to Marvelous, PA to Tremendous. If there is any time left, train PA.

And you have yourself a U21 PG without obscene salary because of low RB, JS and JR.

If you want him to enter NT, I think you will have to raise his ID a bit among other things.

That's how we train PGs in Slovenia for our U21 and they turn out great.

From: HAHA
This Post:
00
216430.40 in reply to 216430.39
Date: 2/6/2017 9:44:02 AM
HAHA001
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
I didn't have great picks in that season, but one of my players was from US, season 20. He was 18 with MVP potential. Here was his first game (46048114).

And now he's still playing for my team. Season 20-37, this has been a long journey, glad he did a triple double in a recent game (93520445). That's a legend.

This Post:
00
216430.43 in reply to 216430.42
Date: 2/7/2017 9:15:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I think he necro'd this thread to show that the staff in the past defended changes they made to push people to train well rounded players. Perhaps instead of complaining about negativity completely disregarding what's being written you could tell us if you think the BBs were right back then or if the BBs are right now. And note that we're talking about secondaries and not 'free skills' (which were only 2, IS and OD).

Should well balanced players cost more than they cost now, while there is no (known) plan to increase the cost of primaries?

Please elaborate.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/7/2017 9:19:50 AM

This Post:
00
216430.45 in reply to 216430.44
Date: 2/7/2017 9:38:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
A game with mono-skilled players would suck.

Players with the best skills should be paid more.

Sounds logical to me.
not really: if mono-skilled cost less than well rounded, they will become more valuable and you will see more of them. It's fairly obvious, especially considering that they take MUCH less time to train.

So you can't have both 'no mono-skilled players' and 'very expensive well rounded players'. Choose one.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/7/2017 9:39:38 AM

This Post:
00
216430.47 in reply to 216430.46
Date: 2/7/2017 7:29:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
This is a game, dude, stop trying to think it's something that it isn't.

You think very expensive well rounded players is better, that's fine. I will buy and build the cheaper monoskilled for myself and you can pay for the TSP what they are worth in salary and more. The salary influence training and roster building, so it all boils down to what kind of game you want.

Also who would be the monoskilled player between Ibaka and Jeff Green and who the mono skilled playerr? Do you want to make a clearer comparison?

Advertisement