BuzzerBeater Forums

Me and my students of the game who I teach on here has a very distinctive strategy to get ahead of new players and seasoned Div Iv players. I have had a lot of success with my strategy and my 1st student is starting to produce positive results as well. If you give players the option of loaning more than 300k and 500k overextension tax then my teachings are invalid and I will have to start over on them.

So in order to make money from training, you need to use subpar trainers. Well everything's great then!

Higher level trainers have higher salaries and higher salary increases. Why do they also have to cost more in signing fees than lower level trainers simply because lower levels are created in greater quantities??

Last edited by Lemonshine at 7/12/2017 7:15:02 AM

Everything works that way here if you haven't noticed it.

Ah mr. negative.

It does not have to work like that. It is a choice.

And it's not like you don't get a good player if you plan your training on lower potential and with a lower level trainer.

Semantics. You do get a worse player or the same player in a longer time. So you get a worse player.

It is mind boggling that people who have played this game for a long time and should really be able to understand how it works still support lower potentials like level Z.E.R.O. aka announcer, level 1 aka bench warmer and so on and support slower training.


Last edited by Lemonshine at 7/12/2017 7:59:06 AM

Well making compromises has always been a big part of the game. You cant have everything.

So if higher level trainers were more common, you wouldn't have to make choices and compromises? Good to know.

You folks are the prophets of doom. No change can ever be good for you. You can't even manage to argue with logical points. Please, answer the original question. Manon at least tried, he said that's the way things are, although it has no idea why the system should be the way it is. So why, logically, a coach with a much higher salary and salary increase should be rarer and cost more to hire? ESPECIALLY if, as the other prophet of doom says, he is not worth the extra cost, not even close?

You fellas are saying: lvl 6 trainer costs 600% of a lvl 4 trainer and adds 10% training. And you hail that as a great compromise and a sensible trade-off? spend 600% or -10% training, what?


The reality is lvl 2 to lvl 7 should be ALL equally available. THEN you'd have a real choice, one that makes economic sense even for you doomsayers, and incidentally it would be good to drain money from the economy AND boost training.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 7/12/2017 8:03:34 AM

I understand that BB tried to copy basketball world as much they can thus I would consider lvl 7 trainers as NBA coaches (or top football league clubs managers) whilst lvl 1 is basically psychical education teacher at school. What you are trying to imply to flatten trainers across all levels in terms of volume. By analogy, you imply that we should have same number of coaches capable to handle NBA team as PE teachers.

I think proportion of trainers is about the right, however would slightly increase number of lvl6/7 coaches as their price is ridiculously high.

Last edited by MGH at 7/12/2017 11:59:56 AM

This is a game and many things do not reflect reality. Guess one of the things that are completely unrealistic as pointed out a million times by a million users. Training!!! YES!!!

So please let's cut the bullshit. There is a group of users which includes Manon who would rather throw themselves in a fire rather than admitting some changes make sense on a number of levels. There is hope because when you see 60 TSP free agents you know someone did make a decision to completely reverse a policy defended to the death on forums, but unfortunately we have a group of users acting against logical decisions. It's good for the economy (money sink) its good for training (a direct incentive) and it's a design CHOICE, because guess what? There are NOT more basic trainers than competent or advanced and that is by design.