BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > Canadas National Team!

Canadas National Team!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248500.371 in reply to 248500.370
Date: 11/9/2014 10:22:11 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
719719
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Well I do believe you have made your opinion known

This Post:
11
248500.372 in reply to 248500.371
Date: 11/9/2014 11:04:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Well, do you not agree that a 150k HOF player is more deserving to make NT than an 8k allstar making U21?

I'm still wondering why our NT standards have increased so much. Chacon, Ferguson, Arsenault, Lachance were on last season's team and none have decreased skills. Hackett and Main are equal to Arsenault and better than Lachance. There are about 5 guards in training who can be equal to last season's Kearns and Stavridis later on. Kearns and Stavridis themselves are fighting off Father Time and are still quality (though I admit these 2 are worth waiting on). There are multiple SF who can be equal to Gaudreault later on. Kearin could be our 3rd best big later in the season. Nixon, if he's still training, would absolutely be deserving.

We just compared fine against #1 ranked USA on their home court. Our ratings at full strength will probably be top 3-5 in the world.



Last edited by Stajan at 11/9/2014 11:05:37 PM

This Post:
00
248500.373 in reply to 248500.372
Date: 11/9/2014 11:57:31 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
1. We are nowhere near the top 3. It was proven in last world cup in games against Finland and Hong Kong (and we had max enth).
2. Until game with Uruguay, we really dont need more or better players. In my mind its better to wait and see whether there are some injuries, etc. rather than burn spots right now, especially with needing to save some players.

Just playing a bit of a waiting game right now and seeing how things develop. Last season we had to be 100% ready from first competative game.

This Post:
00
248500.374 in reply to 248500.373
Date: 11/10/2014 12:40:03 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
307307
But I think your argument (or anyone's really) is why should 3 of the saves be done at the NT level, when it's obviously fielding a more competitive team than our U21 and those spots should be at more of a premium. This season, our NT should compete for one of the spots in the World Championships, and having the extra spots to replace the aging and injured would help.

This Post:
00
248500.375 in reply to 248500.374
Date: 11/10/2014 2:52:01 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
I agree with you, but we can still field only 12 players. For than 14-15 roster spots is enough since I wont be calling people up until Uruguay game to make sure they dont get injured during preliminary phase. Unless U21 loses next 2 games (in which case they wont have anything to fight for this season), there is no need to completely handicap the team.

I will do my best to get into the semis and there fight for World Cup spot, its just making rushed moves and calling up people now would be unnecessary risk (injuries, skill drops) and I believe that since we are not taking that, we should be able to preserve 2-3 spots for saving players without handicapping the team in any way

This Post:
00
248500.376 in reply to 248500.2
Date: 11/12/2014 7:21:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
323323
Breton out for 3 weeks.
Awww

This Post:
11
248500.377 in reply to 248500.373
Date: 11/12/2014 7:52:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
1. We are nowhere near the top 3. It was proven in last world cup in games against Finland and Hong Kong (and we had max enth).

"proven" ???

We used less effort and lost by 7 against Hong Kong. We also used a dreadful offence (21 missed threes). We were also without Hall and Hudgins due to awful gameshape. Combine the horrendous offence we used with the personnel we were without (2 of our only 3 inside iso players) and that's proof that we were better than Hong Kong. We stood a 100% chance of winning with an inside offence. Even if we didn't nail both GDP, I think we were better than them.

Against Finland we didn't have Hall at all and had overall much worse GS (Hudgins, etc). With Hall at SF, Stronks at guard, and Hudgins splitting time at both positions, that changes things. Um, also, their listed guards scored 54 points in 83 minutes. There's no way that's reasonable. Stronks never scores like that -- and if he did, he and Hudgins would be an unstoppable tandem at PG and SG in their own right.

France, we throw that game out the window. They hit GDP and used more effort, we missed GDP. We had no Hall or Hudgins. I think France was the worst team in the group.

We only won by 13 against Czech Republic. It wasn't that small a margin for any reason other than luck. They scored better than they should've against our insane defence. Not a good game to dissect.

This Post:
11
248500.378 in reply to 248500.377
Date: 11/12/2014 11:39:08 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Well, Finland is hardly a world beater, but in a game in which we had better enthusiasm, same effort, used same tactics and same GDP, we lost by 11 (wasnt really close). Of course, GS and lack of Hall had something to do with it. Its possible we could win with both of those not being the case but would be close game nevertheless.

And again, you wouldnt rate Finland as top 3 in the world would you?
Plus, when we were talking about player skills you were shocked that other NTs think that in order for a player to be suitable for NT, they need 130-140 skills. We just dont have talent like that, and although we are pretty good given our userbase, we are not close to top 3 in the world.

You also have to remember that our best players are on the decline without having worthy (equal or better) replacement and it will continue in next season (world cup season).

This Post:
00
248500.379 in reply to 248500.378
Date: 11/17/2014 2:20:27 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
2 2 week injuries for Stronks and Hansen. Not a good news at all.

Called up Chacon.

Last edited by damian13ster at 11/17/2014 2:24:01 AM

This Post:
11
248500.380 in reply to 248500.377
Date: 11/19/2014 1:49:01 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Many thanks to the owner of Hudgins, who is proving that player at 28 years old still can train very effectively. I think its 4 pops this season already, showing that NT players can easily (and should) be trained up to 30 years old. Just 3 more pops and he will be at 140!

Last edited by damian13ster at 11/19/2014 1:52:18 PM

From: Myles

This Post:
00
248500.381 in reply to 248500.1
Date: 11/23/2014 6:36:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
323323
Lineup on Offsite.

Advertisement