BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis 2

Training Speed Analysis 2

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
78242.372 in reply to 78242.371
Date: 11/19/2010 9:49:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Yes, it appears the post has been cut off in one of the edits.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 11/19/2010 9:50:09 AM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
78242.373 in reply to 78242.352
Date: 11/27/2010 5:45:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I have a Lvl 5 guy and hes 17k all my staff are 18k> and its 2 lvl 5s and 1 lvl 4. so you just need to put more rescrtictions when getting staff lol

From: iwen
This Post:
00
78242.374 in reply to 78242.373
Date: 11/27/2010 10:44:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
My 6'8" 23 year old PF has been consistently getting pops in OD every 3 weeks. Level 5 trainer..

This Post:
00
78242.375 in reply to 78242.374
Date: 11/28/2010 2:36:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
395395
My 5'9 point 19 year old point guard and 6'3 18 year old small forward have been getting OD pops about every 1.7 - 1.8 weeks through single position training with a level 4 trainer.

I wish there were pigmen. You get a few of these pigmen walking around I'm looking a whole lot better. Then if somebody wants to fix me up at least they could say, Hey he's no pig-man!
This Post:
00
78242.377 in reply to 78242.376
Date: 12/4/2010 10:34:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
It clearly looks that height is much more influential than age here. At least the difference from 6'1 to 6'4 seems to slow down training way more than the age difference between 19 and 20.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
78242.378 in reply to 78242.376
Date: 12/17/2010 9:04:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
some more OD data, this time for OD 2-position, data received from an anonymous user who trains smarter than I do ;-)
Trainer = level 5

A 19 6'2"
B 20 6'1"
C 20 6'4"
D 22 6'3"
E 22 6'0"
F 20 6'6"

wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6 wk7 wk8 wk9
A 48 47 48 46 48 48 48 48 48
B 48 48 48 47 48 46 48 48 48
C 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48
D 48 48 48 48 48 44 48 29 48
E x 43 43 41 36 48 45 x 40
F x 44 47 48 48 48 48 19 48

OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2 OD/2
A x O+I x x OD x x OD x
B OD x x OD x OD x x OD
C x OD x x OD x x x OD
D x OD x x x x OD x x
E . ID x x OD x x . x
F . x x OD x x ID x OD

Totals: 15 OD, 3 ID, 50-ish weeks of 48 minutes.
(notice: _ZERO_ pops in handling or driving)


This information (particularly the part in parentheses) would be a lot more helpful if we knew:
a) the levels of OD, HN, and DR of all players involved at the beginning of training, &
b) the potentials of the players

As it stands, all that is obvious is that if a player doesn't reach the magical 48 minutes, he isn't very likely to keep on pace with his peers that do. Edit: sorry, it also seems to imply that ID trains faster than HN & DR as a secondary of OD, at least as far as 2-position training is concerned.

(on an unrelated note, I wish these forums had an easy method of making tables so that this type of information was easier to share and read.)

Last edited by darykjozef at 12/17/2010 9:06:25 AM

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: samuli
This Post:
00
78242.379 in reply to 78242.378
Date: 12/23/2010 12:37:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
Hi. Someone has maybe asked about this before but Im in a bit of hurry so i have not time to search it.
So, is it better to get for example 42 minutes 1-position train than 48min 2-positions train? I have three players with 41, 45 and 46 minutes as C this week and Im training C/PF. Is it better to change my training just for centers?

From: juscious

This Post:
00
78242.380 in reply to 78242.379
Date: 12/23/2010 12:50:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1818
yep its better. especially when you only have 3 trainees, so no need to use 2pozition training, 2pozition is 2x slower than 1pozition for the same skills.

This Post:
22
78242.381 in reply to 78242.380
Date: 12/23/2010 8:37:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
2pozition is 2x slower than 1pozition for the same skills.


It's not quite as simple as that. Single position training is obviously faster than 2 position training but it's certainly not twice as fast.

This Post:
00
78242.382 in reply to 78242.381
Date: 12/24/2010 11:40:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
194194
I don't remember exactly but I think somewhere, it said the efficiency of two pisition training is about 75% of one position training.

Advertisement