BuzzerBeater Forums

What I don't get is how with a weak offensive flow like he has, his inside players shouldn't shot that much. Even if he has sensational OD, he is only on strong gameshape and my players all had more jumpshot than sensational. My outside players should've shot much better than they did.

Well I have faced better players and better defences and I didn't have that problem and If his outside players have between prominent and sensational outside defense, my guards passing would've been just fine.

My SF has good JS, not so good JR, not enough passing but has some IS.

If he has players that good on the defensive end why does he only put up respectable on a 3-2 zone?
Comparing with his defense, my offense is good enough to score more points than I did.

I've actually seen aziado's small forward and he had less jumpshot tham mine.
I'm using moutlinho's salary calculator, version 1.1

The PF isn't a starter but I thought that I could take advantage of his high JS and JR, but it didn't go out as planned.

Don't think he's selling any of his players, they're just too expensive.

Not everything is in the ratings. He averages 18.1 assists compared to your 13.5. His defensive record is 1856, yours is 1823. It's more complex than JS vs OD. Think about skills you might underestimate the importance in defence. He has hold teams with better OS than yours to 70-80 points.

You average only 13.5 assists because your team can't pass the ball efficiently or because your team can't score consistantly in the league. If you had both, you'd have a higher number of assists per game. You are mistaken not to acknowledge it. You can't claim you have fine passing AND good scorers for the league.

You claimed everytime Aves has played M2M, the opponent SF shone. I crawled through every league game and showed you were mistaken. Now Aziado's SF has less JS than your SF ? Well, Aziado's SF is more efficient than yours, more points scored, in less minutes, with a better %, better in every stats safe SB (0.6 to your 0.7). He's better but it doesn't matter, that was not the point.

When the salary will update, I will come back to you and we will see your PG's new salary :)

I was just asking, I reckon it's a bit odd he wasn't more involved in offence guarded by a insignificant player... who is 37 :/

Only "a bit" odd? ;D

OK. i know he hat homecourt advantage, and better outside offense and defense, but my inner game should be enougth to overcome that (inside shots have better efficiency than outside shots...)! And what really pissed me off was the OT result... 15 pt difference.... way to much considering he had no PF or C playing!

It's a late answer, but maybe can help you anyway

Your outside players, especially your PG, have bad passing. You should never play Low post if you don't have enough of good passing. At least play Look inside.

The passing made a lot of difference; take a look at your C. FG of 5-13. This would not happen if your PG had better passing and you'd win.

So for me, the main reason you lost is you chose a wrong tactic.

Nah, the 2-3 helped them to lose just by 10 muhahahaha

Epic 2-3 fail.

They would have lost no matter what defense they played.

8/33 from the guards, 16 TOs but the game was lost in defence ?

That depends on whether or not you believe 2-3 is flawed.