BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Is it even relevant?

Is it even relevant? (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: WFUnDina

This Post:
00
241167.38 in reply to 241167.37
Date: 4/30/2013 5:21:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
IF god is responsible for life on Earth, then sure he is responsible for creating gay people. So why would he be against his own creations? Also homosexuality is brought up twice, mean while eating bottomfeeding seafood is brought up 7 times. Do you like shrimp? 1 last think on the bible, IF homosexuality was so important, why is it not in the 10 commandments?

From: Jason

This Post:
00
241167.39 in reply to 241167.38
Date: 4/30/2013 5:24:40 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
IF homosexuality was so important, why is it not in the 10 commandments?


It is, try reading them again. Your argument is silly...God created the rapists and murders as well...does that mean he's for them too?

From: WFUnDina

This Post:
00
241167.41 in reply to 241167.39
Date: 4/30/2013 5:45:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
It's not in the 10 commandments, it may be in the tea parties 2 commandments!!! Also homosexuality has been found to be genetic, as in, they have found it in DNA. Being a rapist or murderer is a choice

From: Jason

This Post:
22
241167.42 in reply to 241167.41
Date: 4/30/2013 5:59:44 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
It's not in the 10 commandments, it may be in the tea parties 2 commandments!!! Also homosexuality has been found to be genetic, as in, they have found it in DNA. Being a rapist or murderer is a choice


I have been trying to resist responding to all of this crap....I can give you article after article that says that there is no gay Gene....it's a lot more complicated than you are making it out to be....If you don't believe in the Bible, God, conservatisim or whatever else, that is fine...I don't care. You can believe what you want to believe...but don't attempt to use loose logic, (especially when your ammo is my Bible) and twist things to fit what you want to believe.

Science is still very much trying to figure this particular issue out....so for you to state these things as facts, is extremely misleading. My point was not to compare whether being gay is a choice or whether a person is born gay....compared to the choices that murders, rapists make....My point was that if you are going to ignorantly claim that since God created Gay people, he must be in support of them...Well God created the Head Hunter Tribes, murderers, rapists, child molesters, and even Los Angeles Laker Fans....that doesn't mean he is "in support" of them.

People have free choice....now, don't twist my words, I am not stating that I believe that Gay people choose to be gay...but my point is we do have free will...so there are many that do bad who could say "well, God created me, so it must be okay" using the logic you used.

Last edited by Jason at 4/30/2013 6:02:05 PM

From: redcped

This Post:
22
241167.43 in reply to 241167.42
Date: 4/30/2013 6:41:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Homosexuality is also rampant in the animal kingdom, even among creatures to which we ascribe very little in the way of "choice" in their actions. Certainly the animals aren't picking sex partners with a knowledge of the Bible's teachings. It's instinct in some form. I think we can agree on that.

So it's very common in nature, which would make it "natural" by definition.

We don't have to know the exact gene to observe and understand this.


From: Jason

This Post:
00
241167.44 in reply to 241167.43
Date: 4/30/2013 6:46:48 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
Homosexuality is also rampant in the animal kingdom, even among creatures to which we ascribe very little in the way of "choice" in their actions. Certainly the animals aren't picking sex partners with a knowledge of the Bible's teachings. It's instinct in some form. I think we can agree on that.

So it's very common in nature, which would make it "natural" by definition.

We don't have to know the exact gene to observe and understand this.



and that's fine, all I was saying is he shouldn't be claiming a gene when there's still so much to be learned when it comes to that. Scientist don't agree on that issue they're still learning and studying.

That said, the Bible wasn't intended for animals, its intended for humans.

This Post:
00
241167.45 in reply to 241167.44
Date: 4/30/2013 7:22:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Some excellent points have been made in this thread.

Now close it before we have a forum with no rules.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Big Dogs

This Post:
11
241167.46 in reply to 241167.9
Date: 4/30/2013 8:22:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I think that's the irony of this issue....A gay person can say how they feel, give all the reasons they believe they are the way they are, and it's acceptable....a straight person can defend gay people, same thing...but if a person is not sympathetic or in agreement with anything dealing with this issue, and they are shallow, right-winged, Bible thumper, narrow minded, or whatever else...

I am not saying that a gay person shouldn't come out, or shouldn't be able to be honest with who they are, but just like in this post, where I point out a different point of view, and am called shallow...there are others that have to work in close proximity with that person, who might be very uncomfortable it (their feelings are real too, and it doesn't make them a bad person)...whether its a trust issue on the basketball court, in the battlefield...or a new-found awkwardness taking a shower around that person...others are affected. But if any of those people are genuinely uncomfortable about it, their feelings don't matter, because we are "evolving" as a nation, and their teammate made a "courageous" decision.


This.

This Post:
00
241167.47 in reply to 241167.46
Date: 4/30/2013 9:02:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
Yeah, your whole "this" doesn't answer any of the points I brought up in response. Feel free to actually add something.

This Post:
00
241167.48 in reply to 241167.38
Date: 4/30/2013 9:02:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
IF god is responsible for life on Earth, then sure he is responsible for creating gay people. So why would he be against his own creations?


I'll respond to this as best as I can.

God created man, but he does not interfere with our free will to pick and choose whatever it is that we are picking and choosing. If you decide you don't believe in God, he isn't going to make you believe in him. I'll also say that according to Christian theology, God destroyed the earth with a flood when he saw that mankind was becoming increasingly evil. It's not that he was against them; he was just sorry that he made mankind. Then there was a man named Noah... and I'm sure you know the story of the ark and the animals.

I believe that God can be against his own creations, but only if they push him over the edge. The Bible states that "God is plentiful in mercy and slow to anger..." I'm not trying to turn this into a Bible lesson, but this is what I was taught as a child.

Like Jason said, God created people that have done terrible things (I.E, Hitler as an example), but that doesn't mean he is in of Hitler killing 6 million Jews. Just my measly 2 cents.

Last edited by Big Dogs at 4/30/2013 9:04:11 PM

Advertisement