When you say "Spurm" and "Pecker" are those meant to be insults? Because you're really just making yourself look stupid. If you haven't realized, the Spurs gave the Heat a serious run for their money in the Finals. Sure, they lost, but it was in a close 7 game series, and the Spurs have only gotten better this offseason. And when you say they don't have any superstars, have you not looked at Tony Parker's stats? He had one of the best seasons of his career, averaging 20 PPG and 7.6 APG, both very close to his career highs. Not to mention that Duncan and Ginobili haven't really slowed down, like Wade did in the playoffs.
And you look like a fool, for not addressing anything I mentioned, about their youth only being good role players, not Superstars. So their Superstars are older then the Heat's. And I'm not sure, what planet, you live on, but Manu, (who I really like) has lost more then a step. Unfortunately. And you can't tell me that a 38yo isn't slowing down. In case you haven't noticed, my handle is WFU. I've been following Duncan, his entire college and pro career. He is slowing down and asked to do less and less each season.
The Thunder have 2 of the best players in the league in Durant and Westbrook. I'm not going to rank them because it's about the team's performance, not the players. However, saying that Westbrook is better than Durant simply isn't true. Durant lost without Westbrook in the playoffs against a very good Grizzlies team, but Westbrook would have too if Durant had been injured. The fact of the matter is, the Thunder would have gone to at least the Conference Finals and possibly the Finals if Westbrook had been healthy.
I agree with how far they could have went with a healthy Westbrook, hell the would have lost in the Finals again. The Thunder feed of Westbrook's attitude/leadership, Durant can't fill that void. Which is why I rate him above Durant.
Any team in the NBA Playoffs can play at an elite level. It's just an issue of talent whether or not it can be enough to beat other teams with more talent.
This just simply isn't true. Do you watch random regular season games and most of the playoff games? Cause if you do, you would notice that when Miami wants they can hit a level of play that is unmatched by anyone in the league, or your just wearing your hater glasses.
So you're basically saying that the Heat are superior to everybody else in the league? In response to your facts:
That 27 win streak had a lot of games against easy opponents.
A lot of good teams are capable of doing that. It's just a matter of which teams you get matched up against and when.
Really? cause all these teams, play the same teams, if it was so easy, we'd have more then just 1 streak that was longer over the past 40 years, right? Actually, in 40 years, there have only been 4 win streaks over 20 wins. That doesn't make it as easy or as common as you would suggest, and 2 of those where actually from longer then 40 years ago, so it has happened just twice in the last 40 years.
PS. Tupac would be rolling over in his grave, if he knew his motto was now a punchline handle.