BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Trade Feature (with Details)

Trade Feature (with Details)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
262158.39 in reply to 262158.34
Date: 8/19/2014 10:34:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
no you are wrong, sorry you assume to know who I am and what I have and haven't done and you assume that your ideas will actually counter events that occur in a game that you ahve little experience in.
I have actually read all your responses, but you seem to missing the point that you ideas will not prevent cheating.

trading = cheating.

trading will always equal cheating, no matter how many different mechanisms you think you can put in place. The BB owners know this, no one is ever going to come up with a solution for it. No matter how many different posts or how many different arguments you come up with. It will never get implemented, whether you like what people are saying or not.

I don't actually like the current transfer system, I hate it because I am based in Australia, the time difference means I miss out bidding for players that I want, unless is tay up until 3am, so for me, the current system is annoying. But trading is not the answer.

Sorry you seem to be unable to accept this, but it is not me that has the problem here, im simply the messenger its up to you whether you choose to listen to more expwerienced people or not and accept this reality

Im not the decision maker on whether suggestions go forward, neither is the GM, but both of us have spent considerable time reading and responding to your answers, because we realise how much effort you put into it and

But fact is, trading has been suggested for this game from day one. and it will never, NEVER EVER EVER be implemented in the game. Not because I say so, not because a GM says so, but because there is no possible implementation that will NOT increase cheating. full stop, end of argument, bye bye now.

Your arguments are moot, because BB will never implement it. You can choose to listen to our understandings of why its not going to happen or not, thats your choice....... simply replying with your understanding of the logic of why it SHOULD happen, will not make it happen, regardless of the fact that you THINK that your logic will prevent events that you obviously do not understand ie; Cheating.

sorry, but thats just the reality. You will find yourself enjoying the game much more once you accept this reality.
For your own sanity i suggest doing a forum search for 'trading' and find how many times this has been suggested by people and this will give you ALLLLL the reasons in the world why it will never ever be implemented.

This Post:
00
262158.41 in reply to 262158.37
Date: 8/26/2014 5:28:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6363
What is also true is the fact that even after several proposition, this has not been added to the game which should answer your question about "what's the BBs are thinking of it".


Actually, it doesn't. I have yet to see any ideas as fleshed out as mine in the forums. I have been searching and searching. Is my idea good enough to be implemented? No idea. Is your response or Regan's or Abu's representative of what the BB's think? No idea. Maybe they'll actually read the proposal and we'll find out.

you are blindly rejecting their arguments


Not likely, since I quote every argument I reply to and explain my reasoning in detail.

abu wordings is harsh and shouldn't be used on the forum


Abu didn't say what I quoted. "Coach" Regan did.

you shouldn't hide behind "you are rejecting what I'm saying because I'm new and that's unfair".


Actually, I wasn't hiding behind anything. I never said what you quoted. I never mentioned that I was new or that my arguments were being rejected because I am new. "Coach" Regan brought up the fact of his experience and I pointed out that he has no experience with a BB system with trades.

This idea is rejected for other reasons who have been given.


And I explained why they were poor reasons and challenged everyone who has replied to actually comment on my idea, not the made up one in their head. You are the only person in this thread that has quoted any of my three original posts that contain the proposed trade idea and commented on the substance. The others just make up reasons why they think it won't work without even looking at what was proposed.