BuzzerBeater Forums

true but a man and a machine hard to beat.. just look at iron man.

But in all seriousness. it would lead to trickle down pay to win economics.. no small user can out bid the top league manager they make more. Even if the small or middle base user were to do so, tax exempt because his fate or our right bankrupt.

I think auto bid is good idea at same time ,there need to be a lot of fair thought into it.

2 things scare me about it the most and second one is transfer of funds between 5-10 teams.. Well organized crime player bidding would be much hard to stop. supporter or not. the 1st I have already said. 1. Pay to win trickle down economics .2.People players in certain people hands for profit

second one is transfer of funds between 5-10 teams.. Well organized crime player bidding would be much hard to stop. supporter or not.

I can't quite understand what you mean there, but I'm pretty sure it can be done also without autobid :).

Last edited by Lemonshine at 11/18/2014 7:50:09 PM

yes true, it can be don't with out. but it more effective with Auto-bid than without it. Its more rapid also more sure mandatory revenue.


Say for example I want to go up 1 mill and you mill 1.5 and next man 2 mill. we can do this all day, we don't have to win. Hell that would help push team to the top more rapidly. Buying super teams over night in top league

I will pay for supporter, no matter what current situation or my status is or will be. I will pay for it. This is the only way, that we can express our support to this game. And I vote NO. That would be the first sirious step to pay-for-win.

I wonder how many people still vote no if they don't want bb to install a autobidfeature. Or vote yes because they like it.
Please read carefully

I wonder how many people still vote no if they don't want bb to install a autobidfeature. Or vote yes because they like it.
Please read carefully

Agree, but if you would recalculate it, i guess the numbers are still the same

only if you assume that people who don't understand it vote 50-50 between the two options. maybe they all voted no because they are against everything, or they are ~66-33 like the rest of the voters, maybe most of the people didn't get it. then it changed the results dramatically. for example: if 50% of all voters got it wrong both options would have the same amount of votes.
although if you read the question wrong in a way that you assume the question is: "do you want autobid?". not only the answers are switched, but the matter of the question is a completely different. the question is if it would give an unfair advantage.
maybe you think it would give an unfair advantage, but you still want to install it (you vote yes in both cases; funny is: a lot of pro-autobid managers would vote yes in the pol because of this reasoning, but hinder the implementation of autobid with this behaviour) or you think it think it doesn't give this advantage but you don't like the feature anymay (in both cases no).

this is also why "We hate this feature and we don't want implement it!" would not answer the question..

but yeah. i guess it doesn't really matter. in fact i prefer the way the question is asked. i just wanted to blabla a bit.



Last edited by jonte at 11/19/2014 11:22:47 AM