BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Tactical option

Tactical option

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
265252.39 in reply to 265252.38
Date: 2/18/2015 5:49:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Why are you so eager to put words in my mouth that I didn't say? Please forget the personalities and stick to a discussion of BB. Thank you.

This Post:
00
265252.40 in reply to 265252.38
Date: 2/18/2015 7:27:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Base offense is dead in my opinion.

The idea behind tactics is to give your team an advantage such that if u had a slightly worse team on paper, tactically you could give your team an advantage.

With everyone playing M2M defense the only way you would win with BO is if ur team is better on paper. Ie your best players will beat his best players. (Generalising a bit here).
Which is fine but tactically totally useless.


This Post:
00
265252.41 in reply to 265252.40
Date: 2/18/2015 7:57:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I totally agree with you. BO is an inferior tactic even when only considering balanced tactics. If you have favourable matchups PTB, II and Patient would give you an even bigger edge.

That's why I invited someone who routinely alternate inside with it to explain why he chooses BO over other balanced tactics since this was the focus of the thread from the opening post. Maybe there's something we're missing.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/18/2015 7:59:05 PM

This Post:
00
265252.42 in reply to 265252.41
Date: 2/18/2015 8:55:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
i think its a default position that people take, because they don't want to use an outside based offence, and have not experimented with II or OO and obviously don't want to use Princeton.

thus this leaves them with BO, Patient, or PTB

PTB tends to highlight some stamina issues, so people play safe and go BO.

That's what I used to do anyways. had a fair bit of success with OI recently. Probably be giving II a go during my Private League games, see what benefits I get out of that.