BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The BB Training Crowd-Sourcing Project

The BB Training Crowd-Sourcing Project

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Tangosz

To: MPL
This Post:
11
203921.394 in reply to 203921.389
Date: 5/26/2013 9:15:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
Ok, I talked with our extension programmer, and apparently this is a new issue with the most current versoins of Chrome (for example, Version 27.0.1453.94 m).

The issue is already listed with Google, and apparently the fix should come in a future update. However, we can't be sure exactly how long that will take.

Considering that non-supporters can only see a limited number of weeks in their training history, at this point we recommend that you either try a previous version of Chrome (e.g. Version 26.0.1410.64 m), to upload these training results. Alternatively, Firefox should work, and you can use that in the interim.

I'll try and post again here whenever the Chrome update arrives to fix this.

Sorry for the inconvenience!

This Post:
11
203921.395 in reply to 203921.394
Date: 5/28/2013 5:23:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
i solved the problem with firefox but chrome still fails. actually firefox seems faster and i will keep to use it.

This Post:
00
203921.396 in reply to 203921.395
Date: 5/29/2013 12:56:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
i'm using firefox and having errors preventing me from doing anything to include synching

This Post:
11
203921.397 in reply to 203921.394
Date: 6/1/2013 5:28:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Ok, I talked with our extension programmer, and apparently this is a new issue with the most current versoins of Chrome (for example, Version 27.0.1453.94 m).

The issue is already listed with Google, and apparently the fix should come in a future update. However, we can't be sure exactly how long that will take.

Considering that non-supporters can only see a limited number of weeks in their training history, at this point we recommend that you either try a previous version of Chrome (e.g. Version 26.0.1410.64 m), to upload these training results. Alternatively, Firefox should work, and you can use that in the interim.

I'll try and post again here whenever the Chrome update arrives to fix this.

Sorry for the inconvenience!


I've just had the same issue...couldn't send the training information to the website. I tried to solve it by using firefox, however it didn't work. Finally, by using the previous Chrome version (26.0.1410.64 m) I solved the problem.

Thank you for the info. +1! :D


Message deleted
From: MPL

This Post:
00
203921.399 in reply to 203921.394
Date: 6/14/2013 6:58:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Hey, it works again!

I don't know if Chrome just did a silent upload or your programmer guy fixed, anyway it's working :D

Last edited by MPL at 6/14/2013 6:58:40 AM

This Post:
00
203921.401 in reply to 203921.400
Date: 6/16/2013 9:55:37 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Not the way I read it
Train IS and get an IS pop every 5 weeks but a JS pop every 52 weeks
the JS pop seems to be just 2%
1 on 1 F's - IS every 8 weeks and JS every 11 weeks
Elastic effect notwithstanding

Last edited by Headless T Gunner at 6/16/2013 9:56:44 PM

This Post:
00
203921.402 in reply to 203921.401
Date: 6/17/2013 11:12:08 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
525525
Second Team:
The Milk
When I increase the range of players a bit to increase sample size these number indeed seem more realistic.

Except that with IS training I believe the JS pop is a bit quicker than 52 weeks and closer to 25 weeks. And the IS pop is closer to 4 weeks than 5 weeks.

With 1on1 the pop on IS might be just a little bit faster as well.


@HeadlessTGunner: Your numbers seemed fine as well but mostly wrote this because I think the 52 weeks for the JS pop is a bit too extreme.


Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
This Post:
00
203921.403 in reply to 203921.402
Date: 6/17/2013 2:49:54 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
even if it was 25 not 52 does it matter?
It's 2% per week according to the data on the site

This Post:
00
203921.404 in reply to 203921.403
Date: 6/17/2013 3:39:56 PM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
525525
Second Team:
The Milk
The data can be viewed in a lot of ways on that site. I used the same site and found .04 and .05 in different ways.

It matters a factor 2. 52 gives the idea that JS isn't even linked to 1vs1 and that it might be a crosspop.

Actually if you look at the younger ages you can see that JS doesn't even train that much slower than IS for players with this length that train 1vs1 forwards. I believe that the ratio between training speeds doesn't change when players get older apart from the elastic effect. So the lower number on later ages is probably mostly due to the elastic effect which works in favor of IS for most small players but JS might often be high already.

Your info was fine, I'm just pointing out that the JS training time is probably an overestimation and quite a big one.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
Advertisement