BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Small Forwards' ratings.

Small Forwards' ratings.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
110979.4 in reply to 110979.3
Date: 9/12/2009 4:24:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
But if you put the SF at guard, he would take his poor defense with him. Does not explain why he would get a higher rating at guard than at SF.

This Post:
00
110979.5 in reply to 110979.4
Date: 9/12/2009 5:00:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
because it consdier less important the low inside defence in the Guard positon than in the Sf position

This Post:
00
110979.6 in reply to 110979.3
Date: 9/12/2009 6:13:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Oh, I'm not referring to my SF. Just go check out the SFs available for transfer - even the ones with strong inside and outside defense either aren't very good or cost millions. Unlike any other position, there doesn't seem to be any middle ground - you either have a poor SF for cheap or spend millions for a decent one.

This Post:
00
110979.7 in reply to 110979.1
Date: 9/13/2009 7:06:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
The player rating is a reflection of the skill strengths used by the GE in calculating the decisions that are each "game". A SF has a wider range of skills measured more evenly than a C or PG. Naturally a SF will have lower ratings unless he has a wide range of very high skills.

Well, that is my opinion anyway.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
110979.8 in reply to 110979.6
Date: 9/24/2009 9:58:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
you should also check the strength of the league those SFs on the transfer market are from....the same SF will have different ratings if he played in NBBA vs if he played in India D.III

This Post:
00
110979.9 in reply to 110979.8
Date: 9/24/2009 11:37:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Would he? I don't think this is accurate. He would certianly have different statistics, but I think the player ratings are independent.


Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
110979.10 in reply to 110979.9
Date: 9/25/2009 3:16:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I highly doubt this. Last season my C and PF got ratings of 10+ against every team but one. When I played him, the ratings dropped to 8.5-9.5. So, the opposition clearly has something to do with the ratings. (Gameshape varied between strong and proficient the entire season, so that can be ruled out)

Last edited by Wolf_Apostle at 9/25/2009 3:26:43 AM

This Post:
00
110979.11 in reply to 110979.10
Date: 9/25/2009 3:38:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Are you speaking about Broekman? Because if you take a look at his season 9 stats, he began getting 8.5, 7.5, 9.5 etc. before going up to 10+. This season he is already up to 10, after starting at 8.5. You are the only team that has played him, seeing as you drafted him in season 6.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
110979.12 in reply to 110979.10
Date: 9/25/2009 3:46:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I highly doubt this. Last season my C and PF got ratings of 10+ against every team but one. When I played him, the ratings dropped to 8.5-9.5. So, the opposition clearly has something to do with the ratings. (Gameshape varied between strong and proficient the entire season, so that can be ruled out)


such differences usually comes from different enthusiam, which has a big effect on rating. Also it could happen through playtime, because usually backup get better rating, so if he a div 1 backup, or div 3 starter could also amke the difference.

This Post:
00
110979.13 in reply to 110979.11
Date: 9/25/2009 6:12:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Broekman has had 16 games in a row with 10.0+ and the in the finals he scored a 9.5 and a 8.5. This makes the point that Arabian knight made stronger.

The same player can get higher ratings according to enthusiasm but also the opponents. A team with a very strong SF in a lower division can probably play TIE more often, thus higher ratings. Consequently, since that team will get higher scores (blowouts & such) , that player plays less minutes which again increases the rating.

However, if that same player is a starter in a very strong league, he will play against harder opponents, stay in the court more minutes and the team probably has less enthusiasm, so the SF rating go down.

Or am I entirely wrong about this reasoning?

This Post:
00
110979.14 in reply to 110979.13
Date: 9/25/2009 6:35:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Broekman has had 16 games in a row with 10.0+ and the in the finals he scored a 9.5 and a 8.5. This makes the point that Arabian knight made stronger.

The same player can get higher ratings according to enthusiasm but also the opponents. A team with a very strong SF in a lower division can probably play TIE more often, thus higher ratings. Consequently, since that team will get higher scores (blowouts & such) , that player plays less minutes which again increases the rating.

However, if that same player is a starter in a very strong league, he will play against harder opponents, stay in the court more minutes and the team probably has less enthusiasm, so the SF rating go down.

Or am I entirely wrong about this reasoning?

You are right,but there's nothing of something new in it :D

Advertisement