BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Way too many teams in the US Tourney this season

Way too many teams in the US Tourney this season

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
163143.4 in reply to 163143.2
Date: 11/3/2010 4:26:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
My point is, due to the randomness of pairing, as you pointed out, you have some early round match-ups where an inactive team faced bots maybe two or three weeks in a row and passively advanced, whereas an actively managed team drew the short stick, had an impossible challenge in the first round, and is sitting it out the rest of the way. Had the bots not been introduced in the tournament this year, it would be easier to weed out the inactive teams.

This Post:
00
163143.5 in reply to 163143.3
Date: 11/3/2010 4:29:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I agree we have too many teams, but if an active team is losing to a d6 bot, uhh, I think they need only blame themselves.

Yes, he should. But what about the guy that hasn't logged in 3 weeks and has advanced against bots. Meanwhile, the active manager in his conf. has had 3 straight top 1k rank teams to face. Should manager #1 really be given an easy trip to the fourth round when there's such an imbalance in the match-ups? It's a competition. It should be competitive for everyone.

This Post:
00
163143.6 in reply to 163143.5
Date: 11/3/2010 7:40:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
244244
And I still got eliminated in the 1st round.:(

This Post:
00
163143.7 in reply to 163143.4
Date: 11/3/2010 9:24:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
And yet, there will still be more active teams advancing more weeks into the tournament than in any previous year, and each teams chances of drawing a top level (DI-DIII) team is less for each round than before. So, if your goal is to play as many cup games as possible, your chances of doing that have been increased this season.

I certainly don't understand the need for a DVI at this point and think it is a waste, but there is absolutely no support for the sentiment that the extra teams have caused good teams to have a lesser chance to advance in the tournament.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
This Post:
11
163143.8 in reply to 163143.7
Date: 11/4/2010 9:55:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
104104
I agree that there are too many teams. It is unfair if a D3 team has to face a D2 team. While a D5 or D6 bot can make it all the way to the fourth round by just getting lucky.

This Post:
00
163143.9 in reply to 163143.8
Date: 11/5/2010 12:40:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
In that case you should be complaining about the randomness of the matchups, not the number of teams. Just read BFiddy explanation, because he's right.

From: Chikent

This Post:
00
163143.10 in reply to 163143.9
Date: 11/5/2010 1:23:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Agreed. The numbers of teams is fine. It's actually better for active managers because it makes it less likely to face another good team in early rounds. The issue people seem to be complaining about is the randomly generated match ups, which I agree kind of stinks all around.

This Post:
00
163143.12 in reply to 163143.11
Date: 11/5/2010 4:36:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
I like the randomness. Much better than going with USA ranks and have first against worse, second against next worse...and so on.

This Post:
11
163143.13 in reply to 163143.12
Date: 11/5/2010 7:40:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I like the randomness. Much better than going with USA ranks and have first against worse, second against next worse...and so on.

I'd be a bigger fan of the randomness if the original pool of teams were only actively managed ones.

This Post:
00
163143.14 in reply to 163143.13
Date: 11/6/2010 5:35:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I think the point was that everyone got their shot...which also produce lopsided match-up, but potentially some exciting upsets. Kind of like the FA Cup (is it?)...sorry, I don't follow English soccer that closely.

Advertisement