BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft dilemma Top 3

Draft dilemma Top 3

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
168636.4 in reply to 168636.1
Date: 1/9/2011 5:13:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Ok, Im training 3 Guards I have been training this season. I have the #1 pick in my draft and will be going to D-V next season. Id like to add another Guard Trainee. But here are my top 3 options. What should I do?

#1 - 5 Star Rating / 4 Star Potential - A - PF - 6'6 - 18
#2 - 5 Star Rating / 3 Star Potential - A+ - SF- 6'3 - 18
#3 - 4 Star Rating / 4 Star Potential - B+ - C - 6'8 - 18

How do I order these 3 up top? And I do have like 5 PGs scouted at 4/3/B+ that I can put after these 3 guys.

What stratagy should I implement here guys?


I'd say 2, 1, 3. Someone said player no. 2 is limited in potential. 3 star is 5-7 potential and I wouldn't call that limited because people rarely train players up to their potential which is around 33-40 k salary for potential 5, 43-65 k salary for potential 6 and 80-100 k salary for potential 7.

This Post:
00
168636.5 in reply to 168636.1
Date: 1/9/2011 5:40:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
#1 can fit into your guard training and make the transition to SF. He's the clear cut best choice for first overall and he'll be an great selection, particularly if he has good OD/JR/PAS because they're awkward or slow to train.

This Post:
00
168636.6 in reply to 168636.5
Date: 1/9/2011 7:37:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Yep, I ordered it 1,2,3. If 1 ends up looking bad as a SF trainee I will sell him and buy another decent guard trainee. Thanks

This Post:
00
168636.7 in reply to 168636.1
Date: 1/9/2011 11:48:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
2,3,1
1 is undersized PF who will have to be trained as Sf and we probably have bad outside skills. 3 just isn't talented enough.
the 3-ball potential isn't that bad for no. 2.
GO for number 2.

Check the Suggestions they are important