Attacking SF is on the outside most of the time playing R'n'G, so defensive SF would have to be there as well playing M2M. The only difference I see is 3-2 team would be switching on D, which would make no difference if PG, SG and SF all had the same OD.
But if I have good rebounders at PF and C, and poor at SF, SG, PG spots, wouldn't be better if the former stayed near the rim all the time like in 3-2, instead of a PF chasing attacking "r'n'g" PF outside like in m2m?
Last edited by thylacine at 5/1/2011 1:05:18 PM