BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Inflation

Inflation

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
268316.4 in reply to 268316.3
Date: 3/20/2015 2:50:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Bucfan, you are so right.

Unfortunately, you could also be right about the BB Gods still not understanding, as a result of which they actually like the higher prices. Very discouraging, very discouraging.

This Post:
33
268316.9 in reply to 268316.8
Date: 3/21/2015 12:15:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Right. High prices making the transfer list unusable for low- and mid-level teams shouldn't worry anyone in higher level teams. You're above all that.

As long as you have figured out training, the game doesn't need the transfer list and certainly doesn't need low- or mid-level teams or those managers. And once you're rid of all those pests the forums will be a lot quieter.

So there are a lot of benefits to outrageously high prices.

This Post:
00
268316.11 in reply to 268316.8
Date: 3/21/2015 2:50:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Just curious, Perpete, how old were those old forum messages you refer to in your post? You started playing in Season 4. Were those posts that old?

This Post:
11
268316.13 in reply to 268316.10
Date: 3/21/2015 3:22:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
And to think it was really just 18 months ago that the economy was a disaster because players were worthless and training was worthless and the only sensible thing to do was to tank and build up money, and that it was time to kill FA entirely.

(246993.1)

Fun times indeed.

The thing here is that we're in a supply and demand environment where the demand can spike or plummet heavily based on the number of users, while the supply will take roughly a year or so to adjust. When the user base constricts by over 50%, and when the voices on the forum during that time keep hammering the message that training is worthless, especially if it's anything below the ultra-high-end potential players, it's no wonder that when the number of teams increases that all the lower to middle range guys that they'd really want to buy are very scarce. I'm not even sure FA would make a big dent in that, either, since it can only add players back to the pool that are actually being created or purchased, and as long as the market has been averse to making that type of player, it's not likely to help a lot.

The thing that I always am amused by is that no matter what the economic condition, it's always to the advantage of the big teams and the disadvantage of the little guys. Prices at rock bottom? Then it's only cup/arena revenue that matters, and only the top teams will have that, and therefore they can carry more wages and the little guy will never catch up. Prices too high? The little guy will never be able to upgrade their teams based on their lower income.

I suppose one could spend his or her time worrying about how they're getting screwed in the current economic climate, or instead take the view that no matter what the state of the market is, any player you train you should be able to use or transfer and replace with an equivalent talent.

This Post:
00
268316.14 in reply to 268316.13
Date: 3/21/2015 3:40:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I'm not even sure FA would make a big dent in that, either, since it can only add players back to the pool that are actually being created or purchased
Yeah it does help. U21 players (or potentially so) would not go to waste when teams are banned and decent/good low to mid level players are also present in teams who go bot naturally.

It would therefore normally apply only to players waived, but, as Trainerman example clearly showed, people now also cut players in order to avoid the transaction tax.

I suppose one could spend his or her time worrying about how they're getting screwed in the current economic climate, or instead take the view that no matter what the state of the market is, any player you train you should be able to use or transfer and replace with an equivalent talent.
This is true, but those who have assets (players) are not losing as much as those who have cash instead

Advertisement