BuzzerBeater Forums

Good afternoon.
Step over here to express myself a little.
First, because not always you to modify some of the game, another part of the damage, because they handle so ?, arrangements only with patches and patches?
Seem like a cure for cancer, using chemotherapy and also damages the malignant cells, kills more good cells.
Because arise not improve things without touching what is right? For two seasons have been doing things "wrong", I think.
What if a modification first test and then if they see does not affect the selection games (they are retarded), positions or statistics of the leagues, and so on. I think it's best to leave things alone if it can not be fixed and leave healthy what is healthy .. Until 2 seasons seems very quiet passage through BB. Now it is becoming more tedious. They do not believe these things, which are small details are critical and directly affect the fall of users? and non stay apeticible and stabilization for the new?
I do not mean to destroy, but to see if before doing anything displayed its repercussions to obtain something constructive.
Greetings and hopefully pay attention to what you tell them. Better a feedback loop (you know)

The gist is pretty much there i think. The voice of the message is lost (anger, frustration, or simply questioning methods).

Point 1 is geared towards the direction that the game itself has gone server wise since the most recent changes were made. It appears that there are more and more issues over the last two seasons. I think the cancer reference pretty much suggests his point there, and i kind of agree. A lot of issues have been cropping up over the last season or so, i'm wondering if maybe it's too much for the game to handle at times.

It looks like he is asking why there isn't some sort of method to test the game. Probably because an alpha server or a private server is a bit tedious to keep up to date at the same time, or perhaps expensive, or both. Looks like he wants status quo to be the primary path for the game.

The last bit is disjointed. Appears original writer feels that the game is taking a dip because of the recent changes. I think from there it's just a reiteration of he'd rather both new and old users benefit from a stable game to play, rather than new features that make the stability of the game especially early in the year questionable.

Forgive me if i have misunderstood some of it, but i felt to take the time to read and try to understand as a native english speaker might aid him in communicating his message and perhaps others to understand his view, even if it is not 100% accurate.

Thanks for the translation, I believe you got the gist of it. As for the reply to the original poster, all I can say is that I understand his frustrations. I've decided a long time ago that game stability is much more important than new features and have worked towards it. Sometimes it really does work out that way, sometimes it doesn't. What I am saying is - I'll try to do better in the future.

Yeah, i don't think it's fair to be critical of you for trying to improve the product with the right changes, and expecting it to go right 100% of the time. I'm not sure what exactly led to what seemed like a more widespread outage last night, but hopefully once the season gets in full swing the problems start to subside again.