BuzzerBeater Forums

Had like 23 in season 10 or so lol. 35-40 were pretty average those days. But had 67 perrenial allstar once.

D-, known on some boards as the d**k minus rating. Yeah it makes more sense to base rating on TSP instead of salary, especially with the new scouting options they have introduced which show a couple of skills.

That's why I often pick lower rating PG/PF formula guys as they are often the safest choices.

I must say my best current trainee was in the C formula and had ok outside skills https://i.imgur.com/wBoGm2R.png, but even then I had another player ahead of him who luckily was taken by someone else. He could have had 1 OD and 1 PA and the rating would have been the same.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 11/19/2019 6:30:45 PM

There was no good draftee in my division this season. It's like that. Maybe next time.

yeah that sucks. TSP for the rating is the way to go. The only ones I feel pretty confident all the time are PFs with high rating, because the secondaries need to be high for a player capped at 7 or 8 per skill to end in that formula. PGs can also be deceiving sometimes, although they are often not as bad as C, because high PA may do the trick and PA it's an easy skill to add. If a short player has C salary, you probably take a leap of faith and hope the outside skills are decent. SFs tend to be ok as well, it usually means low PA, but the rest is generally fine.

You can really feel very happy!

well, I just counted yesterday that he had 37 pops in 2 seasons (and was forced to train stamina once or twice), so I am indeed very happy lol. He's also 6'4'' so his inside skills will come along nicely compared to a 6'0'' or 6'1'' guy. The training speed from Trainer, YT and Gym is actually very good now and 18yo of course benefit more than 19yo because there is an extra year of YT.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 11/20/2019 8:58:10 AM