BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Analyse this game plz. Wierd production from my guards

Analyse this game plz. Wierd production from my guards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
124907.40 in reply to 124907.34
Date: 12/30/2009 1:02:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155


Edit: This was the game i got creamed -> (17853601)


I don't see what this has to do with look inside or low post? I also feel that you were unlucky in this match, if you look purely at pts per 100. I think you deserved to lose, because of your poor match-up at SF. But the game should have been closer.

On the other hand, I would expect more of a rebounding differential but maybe that has something to do with your one-to-one match-ups.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
124907.41 in reply to 124907.33
Date: 12/30/2009 1:03:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
An other game that is shows that u r right. (8665)

This Post:
00
124907.42 in reply to 124907.41
Date: 12/30/2009 1:06:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
An other game that is shows that u r right. (8665)


An interesting example, although the effort certainly had an impact and it makes it difficult to compare the team ratings. But certainly, the PG and SG match-ups were the difference in the game.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
124907.43 in reply to 124907.37
Date: 12/30/2009 1:09:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

I am not saying you deserved to loose by 19 points, but 23 rebounds less is alot...


I tend to look at offensive rebounds, since this gives an extra chance at the basket. And here, the difference was only 3. So I don't think rebounding was a huge difference in this game.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
124907.44 in reply to 124907.42
Date: 12/30/2009 1:12:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
True but looks like best guards can beat best big men in scoring. Watch my big man Gagalatos who had great game against a C with 3 times more salary, and compare it with the game that ive lost, going against same caliber big man.

This Post:
00
124907.45 in reply to 124907.34
Date: 12/30/2009 1:12:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
the first game was away against the best team in germany, and the second was a blowout which is still pretty good because he haven't such weak player i don't have to expect an massacre.


Well, you said that you "often" played look inside against a "9" outside d and since I could not find an example of that, I went with the best examples I could find. Admittedly, I only looked at your games this season and towards the end of last season, so if you can find better examples, I would be interested in seeing them.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
124907.46 in reply to 124907.45
Date: 12/31/2009 4:23:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
259259
right now, I also think that look inside su**s:) look at my game (17803327)
some advices?

From: JohnnyB

This Post:
00
124907.47 in reply to 124907.46
Date: 12/31/2009 8:04:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
An interesting topic: (125704.1) Check this game also. (17979586)

From: idorux

This Post:
00
124907.48 in reply to 124907.47
Date: 12/31/2009 9:06:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Agree with you here - also explains a recent loss of mine as well.

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
124907.49 in reply to 124907.47
Date: 1/1/2010 5:26:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
The Look Inside team only had 9 assists, I think that, because of the low assists, the guards couldn't put the ball inside

From: JohnnyB

This Post:
00
124907.50 in reply to 124907.49
Date: 1/1/2010 5:31:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
U cant make assists when u r big men cant hit anything dont u think?

Advertisement