BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > 5.5M bid on a player!?

5.5M bid on a player!?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
226861.41 in reply to 226861.40
Date: 9/14/2012 9:51:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
That's what I'm trying to do with my C and that's what I think should new owner of Polish SF do.

I don't care if my C will be 24 by the time I'll start training Passing; his PA is 5, while his HA will be 11 and DR 12. So I expect steady 2 weeks/pop and at least 6 pops in 13 weeks (elastic will cease to exist once his PA will hit HA levels).

Well at least at elastic effect we agree...

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
226861.43 in reply to 226861.42
Date: 9/14/2012 9:55:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
You're not reading again, Wolph! He'll be 24, not 26. He's 23 now.

From: Tangosz

This Post:
00
226861.47 in reply to 226861.46
Date: 9/14/2012 10:33:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
Yes, they do, at least the JS secondary of 1v1f.

I actually attribute these different training-increase versus height as conscious design decisions.

1v1 forwards is good for getting some IS on short guys, but not as much for tall guys. Those tall guys are thought to get better IS training via IS@C. THis is similar to the fact that IS secondary of JS forwards has a declining IS training v. height.

In contrast, short guys and guards can more easily get JS from some combination of outside shooting, jump shot guards/wingmen, and 1v1 guards.


From: Tangosz

This Post:
00
226861.49 in reply to 226861.48
Date: 9/14/2012 12:23:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
It was definitely a big surprise when the data started to suggest that height affects training type, not the skill itself.

Advertisement