BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > What defense do you recommend against Princeton?

What defense do you recommend against Princeton?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Melo9

This Post:
00
280157.40 in reply to 280157.37
Date: 6/24/2016 11:36:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
255255

What you fail to see is what a 3-2 Manon talks about actually does. Its quite obvious you think its about pressure forcing turnovers and reduce offensive flow. Its not. Ist about defending inside shots and reducing shot percentage.


Well, ok...I'm just talking about facts here on the link Manon sugested me to check, and giving my opinion lol. Not being disrespectfull to anyone..

On that game I saw Center shooting 11 - 20 and EP 11-18. The guards tho...shot really really bad, and that great. They probable drive the whole game and got the Center blocking/defending them. But again i say, without knowing player skills etc, its harder

Need to test on private leagues eheh

From: GM-hrudey

To: FurY
This Post:
00
280157.41 in reply to 280157.26
Date: 6/24/2016 1:56:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Given what i've tested, most teams prefer not to train passing as high as some other skills. Most tend to prefer OD > PA > JR (not Hrudey though).


I will point out for the record that what I'm doing is somewhere between foolhardy and criminally insane. And fun, I suppose, if you're into that sort of thing.

And on the topic of zones vs. man to man, I will again point out that if you have aggressive players, the zone may not be right for you: (65823062)

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
280157.42 in reply to 280157.32
Date: 6/24/2016 2:03:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Your Inside Defense was low, and he had only 3 TO's lol. You won that game because your team was better basically eheh.
I could also put here a game against a IV division team, where I play 2-3 against Outside Ofense and win


There were 8 TOs, only three steals. There were also 17 blocked shots, which is pretty nice indeed.

This Post:
00
280157.43 in reply to 280157.41
Date: 6/24/2016 2:06:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5959
I'm not sure it's about how aggressive your players is (89753557). Both C fouled out, main in 10 min, second in 37 , pf 5 fouls. Maybe these fouls result of lack of SB for bigs in zone defense?

This Post:
00
280157.44 in reply to 280157.43
Date: 6/24/2016 2:15:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I'm not sure it's about how aggressive your players is (89753557). Both C fouled out, main in 10 min, second in 37 , pf 5 fouls. Maybe these fouls result of lack of SB for bigs in zone defense?


I think the game I linked to was probably before I had gotten to the shotblocking - that was pretty much the last thing I added before free throws for that group. But it was definitely also related to aggression, since the player who decided that night to make Bilbija his personal punching bag was a heavy fouler.

From: Nachtmahr

This Post:
00
280157.45 in reply to 280157.35
Date: 6/24/2016 2:41:28 PM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72437243
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
But on that game I see that you have the advantage with GDP, and your Inside Defense was only 10 low.

A 3-2 zone costs you 10% of your ID.
So you dimish your ID with it... but guess what. SB has almost no influence in the ID rating. So you can't see if someone played with 2 bigs and both with SB 7 or with SB 17. There is almost no difference. But the result as a whole is completly different. The ratings in BB are a mess. You can believe them as much as the weather forecast for next month.

And the reason why 2-3 zone has such a strong rating is that ID gets a huge boost. So the rating rise. But SB has, again, almost no effect on the rating. But you need it. So what is better? A fantastic rating for a defense where you get kicked out of the arena because you have no SB or a crap rating but high SB and a strong defense? I will take the last one 100 times out of 100.

This Post:
00
280157.46 in reply to 280157.38
Date: 6/24/2016 2:46:03 PM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
Wow, I will just not discuss with you, you need lot of experience bro.
You have your opinion, I have mine, that's it. GL

This is where we hold them!
From: Melo9

This Post:
00
280157.47 in reply to 280157.39
Date: 6/24/2016 3:58:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
255255

I hope i shined some light on your BB-world. Many seems to need it here sadly. The LI bandwagon tracks are so deep many cant even see there's a sky above them.


Lol, I don't even play LI :S I prefer outside shoting with my NT player at SF...I've tried 3-2 a lot, on 1 season where I had great OD at SF. But it didn't work out on important games. They always scores a lot of shots midrange, but everygame is diferent. Maybe they had good js bigs, and I had bad OD bigs.

But yeah, I don't even support LI so my BB-world kind oof looks the same
Thats true tho, their guards will miss lots of shots, but maybe with more passing bigs with be 2 for 1 on guards drives, idk

From: Melo9

This Post:
00
280157.48 in reply to 280157.45
Date: 6/24/2016 4:04:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
255255
No idea that SB didn't contribute to the ID rating lol...my bad then.

From: Nachtmahr

This Post:
00
280157.50 in reply to 280157.48
Date: 6/25/2016 2:42:22 AM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72437243
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
No idea that SB didn't contribute to the ID rating lol...my bad then.

No problem. But that is one of the reasons why a team with SB bigs seems weaker than a just ID team. I always take a look at the amount of blocks and the FG%. It helps a little bit more to find out if there is a blocker.

Advertisement