BuzzerBeater Forums

Your amateurish mathematical/probability approach really hurt my eyes, this is such a funny arguement.

If you are going to use mathematics, please do it right.

Buzzerbeater and B3 is about economy first, income and expenses over time, and in smaller countries like 200 users and below IT IS far more easier to tank, to develop and to beat 5 new casual users.

In a country with 200 users in 3 division u have to compete against 2-6 mediocre managers and 10-14 bots

In a country with 400+ users u have to compete with 3-4 mediocre managers, 3-4 good managers , 3-4 really good managers and the rest are some newbies who can still inflict damage. Especially if the country is a basketball country like spain,italy,greece,france and all the balkan territory


People who are saying the system is fine, are either delusional or are having a very good profit from the current situation.

That is totally understandable , Ιf I was from a small country with few users I wouldnt like such a change myself but this does not mean the current situation is fair.

Cheers.

Last edited by Cobra Kai at 2/4/2024 8:15:51 AM

Well I was not talking about how easy it is to tank, I reacted to the post calculating probability of being in B3 final just as I did, but the person did so with wrong numbers (only used a limited amount of smaller nations).

Also, it's not true that you have 10-14 bots in 3 division, due to the consolation all leagues have around 12 managed teams and 4 bots.

If it was as easy to tank as you all claim, maybe we would see more teams dominating the international or economical scenes from these ''smaller countries''? Once again, no evidence provided, regarding actual results, even then, this is a game, so what's your point? This is more than fair right now if there's no abuse being done. The only abuse I see is that bigger nations DOMINATE B3 and BBM. Is it not unfair to us smaller nations? Teams from Portugal have NO chance to compete in B3, our biggest goal is not to get obliterated and we get happy if we can even qualify a team for the next phase. So don't give me this ''unfairness'' crap.

If you actually backed up your talk with evidence and actual solutions I think it would contribute more to this discussion than passive agressiveness.

Also ''smaller'' countries also face their own difficulties did you know that? Just because it's ''not as hard'' as the bigger countries, does not mean there's not a myriad of issues that we are facing over here, and apparently the users from ''bigger'' nations, so far have only focused on their part of the problem. Now you have the evidence from another user from Belgium, who shows you that the situation is not as linear as you think.


I stand by what I said, all of us are facing our own difficulties, my difficulties being different from yours does not make yours more deserving than mine. Punto. I am tired of reading this unsustained gibberish from users from nations with more users, where it's actually much more pleaserful and exciting to play the game, complain about leagues that they are not part of.

Proposed solutions that I think will make everyone happy.

1. Merge smaller nations and micronations : 50-60 users or less
2. Increase % of merchandise for NT players, depending on rank

I remember teams from micronations not being happy at all when the merge took place.

I don't think adding more teams would help that... And not talking about how to replace those new teams on the current nations; how many div 1 teams would lose their division? That's not a good idea at all.

Because then it truly was easy access to money and to the highest divisions, of course many teams will not be satisfied, but that always happens. There are some div's hanging around 20-30 users, where being in II. is guaranteed, and achieving promotion to I. is guaranteed as well. In that regard I agree that's not fair at all because these teams receive free promotion bonuses without even having to try. Either way a merge with these nations, and for example increasing nations of europe to 200 or 300 teams would immensely increase the enjoyment and competition of the league, and it would probably revive nations of europe and create a very competitive 1st division. It all depends on BB's will (no pun intended)

Making profit and winning B3 are 2 different things. So your whole arguement is wrong from the start.

There are several examples of players that won b3 and they are from a SMALL country. Unless finland or belgium is considered a consistently top basketball country both in reality and in buzzerbeater with 500+ users in the past 5-10 years

Both of these winners had an organized plan behind them and they took full advantage of their better economics, either you see it or you dont , it is not about your opinion or mine it is about facts.

Unless I see differently, I will believe the screenshots I have seen from a big and a small country depicting their economics.

So feel free to share your economics. I have no problem doing so.