You're just bitter because I left that embarrassing mark on your team history. You should probably just start over with a whole new squad, to get that mark off of there.
1. That would make sense, except that A&M was founded in 1871, and Texas in 1883. Therefore, it couldnt've been built to despise Texas
2. See #1. Despite what the legislature might have intended, what does it say that it only took A&M a year to organize, but it took Texas 13? They were probably too busy sitting around thumbing their asses about how much better they are than anyone else.
3. It turns out that Texas has this complex where they think that everyone cares about them so much that their lives are centered around it. It turns out, nobody cares about them as much as they care about themselves.
4. I used to dog on the corps a LOT, as a non-native Texan. Then, in high school, I had a family move in across the street from me from Virginia. The dad was a colonel in the Navy, the grandpa was a general, and the other grandpa was something or other else. I asked the Dad, who was injured in Desert Storm, if the corps was viewed as a joke by the military. He said that no, in fact it was probably the highest-regarded non-academy ROTC program in the country. General Patton thought so too. It's pretty shitty to bag on a military program. Lest we note that during WW2, A&M had more officers than West Point and the Naval Academy...combined! And in WW1, the senior class all graduated early so that they could go off to war. The guy who originally wrote this rant is well-known as a tool, and this is just one reason why. And besides which, who is t.u. to complain about sodomy?
5. Ok, really? Slobber? I can use hyperbole too.
6. The point is to remind Texas students which was the first institution of higher education in the state.
The more you know....