BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Why is "Blank lineup" allowed to work?

Why is "Blank lineup" allowed to work?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204731.41 in reply to 204731.39
Date: 12/31/2011 2:34:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
PS: With no lineup how does the coach strictly follow it?

I accidently tried that in this game: (42199897) and it seemed to me that the coach chose players either by age or experience. He didn't consider suggested position or skills as you will easily see. I was very surprised by his starting 5.

This Post:
00
204731.42 in reply to 204731.1
Date: 1/1/2012 2:28:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
It's bit off-topic, but didn't want to create new thread. So is Blank Lineup is when you literally leave every spot empty or you only put in subs or leave positions you want the coach to decide what to put?

This Post:
11
204731.43 in reply to 204731.42
Date: 1/1/2012 3:40:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
totally blank, but i think you could choose some positions from your behaviour. But don't think that putting player A as PG and leave the backup and reserve open work, in this case the backup will not play a lot or nothing.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
204731.45 in reply to 204731.44
Date: 1/2/2012 10:45:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
that it rate defence lower then most managers is imho right, but passing get valued by the system i am quite sure ;)

If you believe they don't play it, and just say it works it is relativ easy to see if they play it or not in the match report and often also in the boxscore.

This Post:
11
204731.47 in reply to 204731.46
Date: 1/13/2012 4:23:21 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Because of this thread
I Tried it in Private league
and coach started my 4th best Center
won't be doing that any time soon

This Post:
00
204731.49 in reply to 204731.48
Date: 1/13/2012 6:14:10 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Headless Thompson Gunners vs. Cemento Armado 79 - 104 (39440165)

Message deleted
Advertisement