BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Ignoring Mutual TIE Requests

Ignoring Mutual TIE Requests (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
35222.41 in reply to 35222.39
Date: 6/11/2008 10:29:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
35222.42 in reply to 35222.41
Date: 6/11/2008 10:38:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
(32764.159)


i see, then you guys willing to follow what BB-Mark suggested (i.e. cool it down a bit) decided to open a thread like this...
very smart of you.

From: ringo™

This Post:
00
35222.44 in reply to 35222.43
Date: 6/11/2008 11:05:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
well, in my post i wrote "very smart of you".
usually people take this sentence as a compliment. otherwise in some contexts, it can be taken as an ironic phrase.
i guess everyone can understand what i was meaning

btw, i'll join the mr_burns "mutual TIE union" as soon as it opens :Pp

From: Emilio

This Post:
00
35222.45 in reply to 35222.1
Date: 6/11/2008 11:25:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Now that I see that this is not a joke. I would say three things:

- No answer for a mutual TIE request, means (for me) NO.
- Mixing moral and ethical arguments seems completely exagerated for just a game. As a game, ethics and morality are restricted to following the rules.
- Some people may think that offering mutual TIE request is highly unfair and lacking of sportmanship.

Enjoy the game! ;-)

Last edited by Emilio at 6/11/2008 11:25:20 AM

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
From: dhoff

This Post:
00
35222.46 in reply to 35222.31
Date: 6/11/2008 11:30:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
We don't want a fake game like the one in the USA first division no?

I'm laughing with you.

Really.

From: ringo™

This Post:
00
35222.47 in reply to 35222.45
Date: 6/11/2008 11:31:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
"uh oh, a new team came in first division. it's stronger than us. maybe we could mutual TIE and play normal against him. cool? cool."

that's not against the rules. that's not a good practice IMO.

From: stogey23

This Post:
00
35222.48 in reply to 35222.45
Date: 6/11/2008 11:33:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
No answer for a mutual TIE request, means (for me) NO.

But what if we know that you reallly, really want it? Sure you've had a couple drinks, and that outfit you're wearing doesn't necessarily mean YES. But still, it would be so good for both of us - it would feel so right.

Why would you want to ruin that?

We can play "Just the Tip (Off)", if you like to ease you into it.

Last edited by stogey23 at 6/11/2008 11:36:14 AM

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
35222.49 in reply to 35222.48
Date: 6/11/2008 11:46:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
What the hell? I really don't understand your complaints. At first I thaught it was a joke...

I'm very sure that this mutual TIE-ing isn't helpful for fair and balanced gamplay. This game is about competition and tactics for god's sake! Do you think it's fair for the people who don't offer their opponents TIE-ing? Of course not, because they don't get the enthusiasme increase!

So in my opinion people who offer TIE-ing should blame themselves, if their opponents use the revealed tactics against them.

This Post:
00
35222.50 in reply to 35222.1
Date: 6/11/2008 12:06:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Why don't you add arranged money laundering to the title? Can you make a template for me to ask my friend to "buy a player" for some extra cash?

This Post:
00
35222.51 in reply to 35222.50
Date: 6/11/2008 1:07:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
Why don't you add arranged money laundering to the title? Can you make a template for me to ask my friend to "buy a player" for some extra cash?

If you don't take this grave issue seriously, I ask that you don't post here.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
Advertisement