BuzzerBeater Forums

defensive ratings of the players on the teams

if you win with 30 points your ratings are better ;) If your defense wasn't dominating, then your offense was so dominating to make even less fouls on this theory to fix the thing. And if you think you just won, because of the Rebounding difference, you could look at the fouls per possesion.

I don't like the team rating that much, because they don't tell a lot anyway.

experience level (you could get average age, although a fairly inaccruate representation of experience stat)

If you like to count the average age i wish you a lot of fun, you need to consider all the player playing and there minutes to get a number you can not really trust.

Experience could be a factor for it, and would favour mostly the stronger teams, because top teams in the BBB are nearly impossible to build with young players.

You might need a large sample to rule out the impact effort and game shape probably play.

effort is a not a term in the bbb, and gameshape currentspondent to the abilities so it would affect it like additional skills and if that made up the difference betwen the team i wouldn't look on that game because it get close.

I had an sample over 30-50 games, where effort wasn't also nearly a non factor.(yeah i know old engine^^)

Yo peoples, you are really hijacking my thread, nah'mean?

There is this hilarious "hidden aggression" attribute, that I would like to train away - what you are talking about has really nothing to do with my problem, or more precisely maniacs that foul out in virtually every game no matter what their skills are and no matter what skills or tactics the opposition uses.

There are plenty of players that average like 6+ fouls/48 minutes for their whole career and thats something that should not exist.

God bless you!

Like if its related to OD rating vs. flow

which doesn't reflect the playmaking of the bigs, which could be quite effective. You can not even really predict if a team is affective to a fcp with the flowand your OD rating.

or ID vs. IS]

line up one good and a weak center against balanced, you get decent rating but the opponent scores on the weak link quite well.

haven7t you noticed when you play a monster big (or against one) and the defender is highly outmatched EVERY time an inside shot misses its a foul????

i have notice that they get rare, but sorry everytime a foul that is so far away from the truth. You could look at nearly of every game out of my example, in 90% of the cases the centers are outmatched and have some miss shots.

[qI think this is common knowledge. So that to me makes it pretty obvious that the matchup plays a role, atleast on inside shooting fouls.]

yes shooting fouls occur lot more after miss shots, and "and 1" are still pretty rare in the engine. So the relativ amount of the missed shott who occur is higher because of the rarer even of a miss shot - but this didn't lead to the point that train your defence you make more fouls. I just think that BB Players are pretty smart at fouling and foul so hard that you can not make an +1 that often.

PS: i found my old cheat and uploaded it:
http://www.https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ak9msOS7DxCIdHVFSUN5Tm9WdTBuS3Iyck5WY3d6Tnc&hl=en_US#gid=0]

Edit: also how you like to group the ratings, do you want 100 games where respectable high play against average low? The Points reflect quite well if an offense work, and also considers stuff like missmatches, was it an outside or inside shot etc.


Edit: (362096.1) Look at my ooutside shooting and their OD rating, consider that they play at home and with more effort. Now look at my 3point percentage and say me that i was lucky or that this was clear with this rating. I had several bad missmatches outside even against a bot, but i had big who can shoot the rating don't know about but thx to the engine he scored like hell(till an guard comes into game who could shoot)


Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/5/2011 11:27:38 AM

ha i did think of this before soz about that!

If i do any research into it, ill start a new thread in the general forums.

I think Crazy-eye is taking it very much from a 'team-game-strategy vs other team-game-strategy perspective'

Which isnt wrong! Its totally applicable. But ill probably take more of an individual approach, and ignore strategy and opposition. For the time being anyways :)

I don7t think you'll find even one that has played more than 2 seasons and fouled out every single game. It's not that bad, you are exaggerating a bit.

Of course I am exaggerating, but I mean my guy is averaging like 12 fouls/48 minutes and he is far away from being in the top 1000 of this game, so I guess there are some players even worse like him, maybe you will find some of them on bot teams in lower leagues - if I find one I'll let you know.

holla!

I remember that Estonia had one of those guys in the NT. When our NT was still strong. He was a great defender, but he was always in foul trouble (yes you can be both). Still he was a regular starter in the NT.
It seems to me that you are just pissed off that you threw 750k away on a legend, that can't be effectivly trained using one match per week.

If you can't readily find this kind of player...maybe its not a problem.

Your guy is still young. I think you could make a spreadsheet/gamelog. Can you really show that he is getting that many fouls against equal compeititoin?

maybe you give of some prooves for your theorys?

It seems to me that you are just pissed off that you threw 750k away on a legend, that can't be effectivly trained using one match per week.

Thats definitely one part of the equation, but I always commiserate managers that were unlucky to get those type of players. Although its more about the name "wasted", than the money in this case.

If a player has a weak skill you can do sthg about it, by training it and plugging the leak. if you got a fouling maschine you are screwed and have to live with that all the time. Thats why I think there should be an option to do something actively to get rid of the aggression.