BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 18 Smack

Season 18 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
200205.42 in reply to 200205.41
Date: 11/3/2011 12:15:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
So you're not waiting for her to get to college, just kindergarten...nice!


This Post:
00
200205.43 in reply to 200205.38
Date: 11/3/2011 7:57:17 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849

Wow. Is it the 1930s already?


To quote Stuart Scott, "hater in the house".
Everyone knows it's the 90's. Proof: (http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2011/09/its-90s.html) Not particularly amusing, but that wasn't the point.

boo-yah.

This Post:
00
200205.44 in reply to 200205.43
Date: 11/4/2011 1:30:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4747

Wow. Is it the 1930s already?


To quote Stuart Scott, "hater in the house".
Everyone knows it's the 90's. Proof: (http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2011/09/its-90s.html) Not particularly amusing, but that wasn't the point.

boo-yah.


I had never heard the saying before, and when I looked it up, it was referred to as Jazz-age slang.

This Post:
00
200205.45 in reply to 200205.44
Date: 11/4/2011 3:47:43 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Everything is Jake


From: Edju

This Post:
33
200205.46 in reply to 200205.9
Date: 11/4/2011 5:13:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
well someone had to do it. we haven't had a proper start to the thread since season 15!

There, there.

It's time I told you the truth, big fella.

Edju isn't coming back.


[citation needed]

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: Calum
This Post:
00
200205.47 in reply to 200205.1
Date: 11/6/2011 1:46:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Would I have won this (39452565) match with Look Inside?

From: shikago

This Post:
00
200205.48 in reply to 200205.47
Date: 11/6/2011 3:03:08 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Sorry, have no idea.
Off-topic: Ever since hearing you're Scottish, I imagine your posts as being read by Shirley Manson.

This Post:
00
200205.50 in reply to 200205.49
Date: 11/6/2011 6:58:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Wow, nothing like being down 33 in the 3rd quarter of a game where you have a slight edge. Welcome to the NBBA, me. Where sh*t doesn't make sense.

This Post:
00
200205.51 in reply to 200205.50
Date: 11/6/2011 8:08:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
I would guess you're underestimating the importance of OD and flow at this level if you think you had a slight edge in that one.

But yeah, I'd at least think it should have been closer given the ratings.

This Post:
00
200205.52 in reply to 200205.51
Date: 11/6/2011 8:47:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Not sure what you mean about OD considering I had his outside attacks covered, as well as his inside attacks..

My saying I had the slight edge is going off of pp100, where it shows I should've had 90.8 to their 88.8. Considering that and ratings are calculated through our player ratings and tactics, its the only thing we really have to go off of, so I wouldn't say I'm underestimating anything.

That said, I figured it would be close and most likely a tossup. I'm just baffled at how it was a blowout.

Advertisement