BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > Highest Salary U21?
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
How long to train a player? (m...
1
Did you know?
7
Buzzerbeater World Cup
3
Social media idea
1
Largest point margin
3
What it means to be a top team...
1
BUZZ R. BEATER Social Media
1
BB Donations
22
Bug or normal occurence?
3
Highest Salary U21?
46
Killer surplus
7
Old players still popping skil...
4
Money in the bank tax (moved /...
1
Support Cost
3
New Salary Formula?
14
So long as....
2
Is the market at its lowest?
71
Changes not announced in advan...
7
Is BB dying a slow death - Par...
817
How to advertise the game (mov...
1
<
>
Favorite Folders
Highest Salary U21?
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
ned (1)
GM-Perpete (1)
justme (1)
Lemonshine (2)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
Lemonshine
To:
E.B.W.
This Post:
0
299745.42
in reply to
299745.33
Date: 5/16/2019 8:52:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1490
I have no problem with training monoskilled players per se. I have 2 issues with these folks:
1. This is not the best way financially or strategically to train a player and they insist it is good for new managers.
Primary-only training does not benefit the training team the most. This is why 'farms' do this, these teams are willingly taking a hit for the community, they are teams sacrificing and not competing.
It would be ok if a manager is told: you can train these player(s) for the U21 and we collectively can try to compete against large nations, but it will come at a cost for you, a cost in $$$ paid weekly, a cost for you not being able to afford other players who may allow you to climb the ladder and a cost for you for getting a worse final product than this player could be.
However, the reverse is happening here: they sell this saying it's convenient and efficient for new users and it helps them grow.
2. Even if you go the monoskilled way these are high potential players (MVP or HoF otherwise they will likely cap). It's not a problem if you assign some of these players for the U21 if you are Italy, Spain and the US or China. Lots of managers and lots of high potential trainees. 200 users nations may want build for the NT instead and that kind of training does align with the individual trainer interest and progression.
Let's have an example. This guy is currently on the market
Weekly salary: $ 3,667
Skills: 2/2/4 1/4/7 7/6/6/7 18yo 7'0“ 10 potential
This guy can become a 135-136 TSP player, 19/18/15/11 inside skills with 12 OD, 12 PA and close to 19 ID by the end of his 28yo season (assuming at least a 5 trainer and level 3 gym and assuming .5 sublevels). Would a 135-136 TSP player with 12 OD, 12 PA and those inside skills play for virtually every NT in BB? I thought so. He also would have 26k salary at 22yo whereas if you only train his inside skills he would have 150k. That's 120k salary gap at 22yo, a 90-100k salary gap at 23yo etc etc, until you catch up 3/4 season later: how much more does a monoskilled player cost in salary over his life, even including the extra trainer cost you need to add 90 skills instead of 60?
Last edited by Lemonshine at 5/16/2019 9:10:16 AM
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Lemonshine
This Post:
0
299745.45
in reply to
299745.44
Date: 5/16/2019 3:18:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1490
(8170434)
584k
(4845180)
616k
(4752399)
649k (this may be the highest ever)
(16739976)
211k at U21
The old thread had 760 comments and some are just links to players...
Last edited by Lemonshine at 5/16/2019 3:23:02 PM
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
ned
To:
justme
This Post:
0
299745.46
in reply to
299745.44
Date: 5/17/2019 2:38:01 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
btw the thread was about u21 players
1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images