I can not understand at all how answering this bizaar question helps Nippon NT.
Nothing new.
Big story, obsession, conspiracy theory about multiaccounts, and... nothing helpful.
It isn't strange question. It's typical dilemma of NT coach every week. In other words this question sounds: "Which 2 of these 5 should be out of squad?". Two the best bigs are much better, so they will be in squad for 100% sure, so choice is only between these 5.
since our opinions are not reflected of or correlated in any logical way to what the opponent will end up selecting. Not in the slightest.
Trying to figure out how the opponent is going to set his depth is a worthy cause, I'll give you that. WIthout knowing the starters, we also would not know how many minutes any of the guys mentioned will play at whichever position....
So it means that if you don't know all skills of opponents it's impossible to set lineup...
In this case, i am trying to help you but again explaining to you that the PF and C positions are different positions
For me they could be the same. I would be happy if I had C and PF with the same skills. It's oppinion of World Champion NT Manager. Have you different oppinion? You didn't win WC...
Think of guys like Lebron James and Carmelo Anthony
I don't know their skills, I think they are weak BB players.
To me SF and PF are as similar as PF and C. IN this came most people clump PF with C
Currently in NBA we have only 3 possitions: C, F, G, you can check it even in boxscore. Not 5 possitions, only 3. Even in NBA allstar voting 2013 we have only 2 possitions: guards and frontcourt players. So "PG/SG/SF/PF/C" distinction is oldschoolish:
http://www.allstarnba.es/ballot/