BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Outside attack too strong ?

Outside attack too strong ?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125704.425 in reply to 125704.424
Date: 2/2/2010 3:47:04 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
let's celebrate, today i won playing low post (17981240)
smy attack rating was "only" the double of his defense, but i still won it in the OT

So maybe you shouldn't be playing a $13,000 salary SG at PG?


eh, i'd like to have the money to buy a 40k+ player also on that last role


i think he is also complaining about him to be a SG and not PG, which normally is a sign for a good shooter and not so good passing player.

But overall your shots are made from the guys who have a good matchup Rating, so flow wasn't the key i think a bit of bad luck depending on my favorite rating the matchup one, but also your opposition is not totally crap the players rating aren't weaker then yours and he has homecourt(the team ratings i actually don't like much, and especially for Li/Lp you get pretty easy high ratings in comparision to outside attack, which don#t work that good like they look but here you are definately over the defence).


no, i understood his point
actually, i've always being surprised of the fact my "PG" is considered a SG by the game
his passing is good (3 levels better than his JR), and he's not a great shooter

i think it's because he's a bit lacking in handling

and i'd REALLY want to buy a better player, i just can't afford him at the moment (i'm training one, but he's still 18y old)

Last edited by mark_lenders at 2/2/2010 3:48:22 AM

From: 7ton
This Post:
00
125704.426 in reply to 125704.425
Date: 2/2/2010 10:37:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Played look inside against strong OD in this match. (19998524) Didn't expect anything so I TIE. Very surprised with the result. But my PG (my team's best passer) still make the most shots and only 1/3 of the shots came from my PF/C.

This Post:
00
125704.427 in reply to 125704.426
Date: 2/2/2010 11:54:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Very surprised with the result. But my PG (my team's best passer) still make the most shots and only 1/3 of the shots came from my PF/C.


It's simple math; your PG (your best passer) could not get a good look because a good 3-2 defense; time is running out and shoot the hoop with impossible chance. Or Even when he was able to pass then already your PF/C got in a position/time which only shoots may occur with low success percentage.

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
From: CrazyEye

To: 7ton
This Post:
00
125704.428 in reply to 125704.426
Date: 2/2/2010 6:09:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Very surprised with the result. But my PG (my team's best passer) still make the most shots and only 1/3 of the shots came from my PF/C.


if you now take your SF into consideration, who had better possibilities to score then your center, most of your shots come from the rigth player - and your PG also played the most time.

This Post:
00
125704.429 in reply to 125704.428
Date: 2/5/2010 3:03:41 PM
BG Samuraj
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
What do you think about this game?(19952503)
BG Samuraj Team Ratings Gachai

Look Inside Offensive Strategy Run and Gun
3-2 Zone Defensive Strategy 1-3-1 Zone

This Post:
00
125704.430 in reply to 125704.429
Date: 2/5/2010 3:47:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
My opinion.

Your inside players took a lot of shots which is good, a lot more than the average look inside ofense and they did it with great %.

Problem was the FG% of your perimeter players. Did they shot a lot from the outside or did they tried most of their shots near the rim? Maybe the problem is their inside ability to make inside shots. Check that on the match viewer it's way more important than the match ratings.

This Post:
00
125704.431 in reply to 125704.429
Date: 2/7/2010 5:38:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I don't think the tactical choices told the story of my victory in this match. I had 7 more offensive rebounds, 6 less turnovers, 6 more three-pointers, and shot more FT with a better% ( 68% vs. 80% ). Your tactics kept you in the game. Your poor guard play and rebounding lost it for you. Also, all of your players played 48 minutes which causes them to perform at a lower level towards the end of the game.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
125704.432 in reply to 125704.1
Date: 4/10/2010 10:05:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
144144
no, that's ok.
nono, that's ok

(20452785)

This Post:
00
125704.433 in reply to 125704.432
Date: 4/11/2010 1:25:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Bad offensive flow that resulted in 13 more turnovers. But looking at the ratings you probably should've won

This Post:
00
125704.434 in reply to 125704.432
Date: 4/12/2010 1:22:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Typical match of outside against inside, where the SF makes the differences, in this case his SF did it... also he defended well your SG.

This Post:
00
125704.435 in reply to 125704.434
Date: 6/28/2010 1:08:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
Hey, I'm new, so bare with me.
So basically, if you want to run an inside offense effectively against an outside defense, you first have to make sure your perimeter players are good passers?
Seems logical to me, if your guards can't pass the ball, they'll end up taking bad shots late in the clock.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
Advertisement