BuzzerBeater Forums

I can not understand at all how answering this bizaar question helps Nippon NT.

Nothing new.
Big story, obsession, conspiracy theory about multiaccounts, and... nothing helpful.

It isn't strange question. It's typical dilemma of NT coach every week. In other words this question sounds: "Which 2 of these 5 should be out of squad?". Two the best bigs are much better, so they will be in squad for 100% sure, so choice is only between these 5.

since our opinions are not reflected of or correlated in any logical way to what the opponent will end up selecting. Not in the slightest.
Trying to figure out how the opponent is going to set his depth is a worthy cause, I'll give you that. WIthout knowing the starters, we also would not know how many minutes any of the guys mentioned will play at whichever position....

So it means that if you don't know all skills of opponents it's impossible to set lineup...

In this case, i am trying to help you but again explaining to you that the PF and C positions are different positions

For me they could be the same. I would be happy if I had C and PF with the same skills. It's oppinion of World Champion NT Manager. Have you different oppinion? You didn't win WC...

Think of guys like Lebron James and Carmelo Anthony

I don't know their skills, I think they are weak BB players.

To me SF and PF are as similar as PF and C. IN this came most people clump PF with C

Currently in NBA we have only 3 possitions: C, F, G, you can check it even in boxscore. Not 5 possitions, only 3. Even in NBA allstar voting 2013 we have only 2 possitions: guards and frontcourt players. So "PG/SG/SF/PF/C" distinction is oldschoolish:
http://www.allstarnba.es/ballot/

Today we played very well and lost vs Italy. It means we have no chance to promote to World Championships. In next week we will play last match in Repechages, it will be game for nothing. Then we will join to Consolation Tournament.

Looking forward we shoudl pick those teams to try to beat. Our defensive holes matter less and its easier to score. I think if we TIE the first game and CT that games we would ahve won, even using the lineup you selected.

Please stop trolling and confuse others in this topic.
All you wrote is BS, your only goal is to sabotage NT and my job.
In first match in previous season we played against Vietnam, last position in ranking (98 of 98). We used normal and with the same effort we won by 4 points. On forum it was called as "great win" (223958.6). In fact it was big mistake, we lost enthusiasm vs the worst NT in BB and it was one of reasons that we didn't win medal in previous season.
Now you claim that we should win with Italy, tripple world champion... It makes me laugh.
Most of Italy monsters have better secondaries than our players.
So maybe I'm not, as you said, the worst NTM in Japan history if during ten weeks I changed team, which have problems to win vs the worst NT in BB by using normal, to team, which should win vs most titled NT in history.

he has cut a player, costing our team enthusiasm. Before todays match.

Please stop trolling and confuse others.
We didn't lose enthusiasm, I didn't make anything, which was painful for us.

My concern is this guy is not playing by the rules #1

Please stop trolling and confuse others.
It isn't allowed to accuse others on forum that they are breaking rules. Please use cheating report tool.

that he doesn't know what he is doing #2

Please stop trolling and confuse others.
I know what I do. You don't know what I do.

and most importantly taht he will sacrafice the wellbeing of our entire NT program for his pride and to spite me, as he proved by dumping Tsunami before our final game and last chance to make the 2nd chance qualifiers.

Please stop trolling and confuse others.
I don't and didn't sacrafice NT, results, etc. We made 2nd chance qualifiers.

Another option is to TIE both of those games and to CT you guys today.

Please stop confuse others.
It wasn't option. Even if we won vs Macau and then vs Australia (even if it would be hard to secure our win vs Macau and save enough enthusiasm to win vs Australia) then we wouldn't take 2nd place because of points difference. 3 teams would have 4-1 win-lose record however our PD would be the worst. So only chance to get 2nd place was win vs Taiwan, and force Taiwan to finish with 3-2 record. It was effect of previous match, in which Australia won vs Taiwan.
So very important thing is to analyse situation in group, and you proved, that you can't do it properly.