To complement this information how did :
- Duncan doughnuts pick before Sporting Chisinau, so what matters for a first pick is not the standings but the victories? I mean he could have less victories than Sporting (2 vs 3) but still he's above in his standings, unless what matters is overall league standing not conference standing meaning that in the overall league standing Duncan would have finished lower than Sporting
BUT here is where it gets interesting
Cardiff cards, the LAST team of the conference where duncan was and the last team if you count overall league standings picked in first place in all 3 rounds
Draft Summary:
https://buzzerbeater.com/league/17749/draftSummary.aspx
League Standings
https://buzzerbeater.com/league/17749/overview.aspx?Season=54
Players Drafted by Cardiff Cards
Taylor, Bart Cardiff Cards 1 1
https://buzzerbeater.com/player/49988074/overview.aspx
Annand, Fred Cardiff Cards 17 2
https://buzzerbeater.com/player/49988056/overview.aspx
Goltser, Jim Cardiff Cards 33 3
https://buzzerbeater.com/player/49988051/overview.aspx
EVERY single one of these players is a superstar!
Which is weird! If he invested into the draft SURELY he has picked atleast one 5/5 player, granting him atleast one MvP player! And surely, by picking before Duncan he would get the better player not Duncan?
What is even weirder is he has got 3!!! Superstar players in his draft, shouldn't atleast one be worse Potential than the others?
Investigating this issue arised so many questions in me, if someone could clarify them it would be great
Last edited by sergio at 10/6/2021 4:01:24 PM