BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
66297.43 in reply to 66297.41
Date: 1/2/2009 3:36:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
is there any way i can remember his number so that i could retire his number?

This sounds a bit funny to me. You want to retire a number you don't even remember... Are you sure that number is legendary enough to be retired if you don't even remember it? :-)

This Post:
00
66297.44 in reply to 66297.43
Date: 1/2/2009 8:00:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
well, not all that goes in the hall of fame are legendary.. it's just they have a big impact on the team, whether it's on or off court...

That's the same theme for me.. as it's ideal for a team who's just given a number by a couple of seasons.

i understand that it's kinda ironic... but yeah i hope that would be possible... i never even have the screen-shots of them... :(

This Post:
00
66297.45 in reply to 66297.44
Date: 1/2/2009 12:35:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Can players enter more than one hall of fame? There are transfers you know. Not my case just curious.

This Post:
00
66297.46 in reply to 66297.45
Date: 1/2/2009 2:12:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
I love the HOF and the implementation of it is very good. I especially like that it is possible to elect players that are no longer part of your team.

One thing though, I dont understand why a player has to play a certain amount of games to be elegible. In my opinion it should be up to every team owner to decide the criaterias for their HOF.

For instance, suppose you have a player that makes a stellar performance in the league final and brings the club its first national title, then I would like to add such a player to the HOF independantly of how many games he has player for the team (not that I have any right now though).

This Post:
00
66297.47 in reply to 66297.46
Date: 1/2/2009 2:55:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I love the HOF and the implementation of it is very good. I especially like that it is possible to elect players that are no longer part of your team.

One thing though, I dont understand why a player has to play a certain amount of games to be elegible. In my opinion it should be up to every team owner to decide the criaterias for their HOF.

For instance, suppose you have a player that makes a stellar performance in the league final and brings the club its first national title, then I would like to add such a player to the HOF independantly of how many games he has player for the team (not that I have any right now though).


That's probably to prevent users from clogging the HOF with pretty much everyone that has ever played for them, which takes up a crapload of extra space.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
66297.48 in reply to 66297.47
Date: 1/2/2009 3:09:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
I love the HOF and the implementation of it is very good. I especially like that it is possible to elect players that are no longer part of your team.

One thing though, I dont understand why a player has to play a certain amount of games to be elegible. In my opinion it should be up to every team owner to decide the criaterias for their HOF.

For instance, suppose you have a player that makes a stellar performance in the league final and brings the club its first national title, then I would like to add such a player to the HOF independantly of how many games he has player for the team (not that I have any right now though).


That's probably to prevent users from clogging the HOF with pretty much everyone that has ever played for them, which takes up a crapload of extra space.

As there is a limit of a maximum of 1 player for every second season in the game I doubt that it is the reason.

This Post:
00
66297.49 in reply to 66297.48
Date: 1/2/2009 3:31:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I love the HOF and the implementation of it is very good. I especially like that it is possible to elect players that are no longer part of your team.

One thing though, I dont understand why a player has to play a certain amount of games to be elegible. In my opinion it should be up to every team owner to decide the criaterias for their HOF.

For instance, suppose you have a player that makes a stellar performance in the league final and brings the club its first national title, then I would like to add such a player to the HOF independantly of how many games he has player for the team (not that I have any right now though).


That's probably to prevent users from clogging the HOF with pretty much everyone that has ever played for them, which takes up a crapload of extra space.

As there is a limit of a maximum of 1 player for every second season in the game I doubt that it is the reason.


For now it's not much but down the road, many, many seasons in it will be.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
66297.50 in reply to 66297.49
Date: 1/2/2009 3:44:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Yes of course, but as there is a limit of one hall of famer every second season I am confident that the limit on minimum games played affects very little. There are probably not to many users that have players with few games that they still want to add to their HOF, so the effect on the amount of hall of famers is probably very limited.

Furthermore it would be easy to create some other restriction if the amount of hall of famers is the reason for this limit. For instance selecting a player that does not fullfill the criteria of minimum matches played could count as selecting two players for the Hall of Fame, i.e. it would take you four seasons before you could select your next hall of famer.

This Post:
00
66297.51 in reply to 66297.11
Date: 1/2/2009 4:35:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I actually agree with him. Why is the game limit necessary? We can only add a certain number of players anyways. The games limit just narrows our options nothing else.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
66297.52 in reply to 66297.51
Date: 1/2/2009 6:22:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Game limit is great imo! Hall of Fame guys are not one game wonders!

This Post:
00
66297.53 in reply to 66297.49
Date: 1/2/2009 8:47:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I love the HOF and the implementation of it is very good. I especially like that it is possible to elect players that are no longer part of your team.

One thing though, I dont understand why a player has to play a certain amount of games to be elegible. In my opinion it should be up to every team owner to decide the criaterias for their HOF.

For instance, suppose you have a player that makes a stellar performance in the league final and brings the club its first national title, then I would like to add such a player to the HOF independantly of how many games he has player for the team (not that I have any right now though).


That's probably to prevent users from clogging the HOF with pretty much everyone that has ever played for them, which takes up a crapload of extra space.

As there is a limit of a maximum of 1 player for every second season in the game I doubt that it is the reason.


For now it's not much but down the road, many, many seasons in it will be.


Many many seasons!!! Wow at the rate of 7 seasons per 2 years managers are going to have to be playing for some time to clog up their HofF!

With training speeds slowing down considerably - its going to be some time before the next crop of players can outperform let alone justify inclusion..... if this trend continues then the future 18/19yo will likely have to be around 3 physical years before they start to impact games on a level where their managers may then decide them worthy to consider.

Advertisement