BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > 5 place = punishment

5 place = punishment

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
90007.43 in reply to 90007.39
Date: 5/17/2009 2:01:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
rank 6th and 7th however risk the relegation,and the next season rise up again it's not so easy,especially in the highest division of biggest championship(take a look to the level of some italian III division).They have more incomes,but also more dangers than other teams,so i think it's not so fair to reduce incomes for teams who plays playout
The probelm is for the teams which arrives 5th(and also 8th),which don't have any incomes in these weeks
So I think that gave him the incomes of scrimmage generated by the system between the two 5th teeams and the two 8th teams could be fair(scrimmage with the few public of the normal scrimmages,with incomes divivde between the two teeams).It could be fair for every team

This Post:
00
90007.44 in reply to 90007.43
Date: 5/17/2009 2:04:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Its the teams at the top that are going to struggle to maintain the gap between them and the chasing pack so i would agree that a tapered reward system with the cash from 6th/7th place being distributed mainly to the 1st seed but give a little also to the 5th placed teams too.. i would hate to come across as being unfair.

From: Vegas
This Post:
00
90007.45 in reply to 90007.44
Date: 5/17/2009 3:27:09 PM
Team 77784
IV.52
Overall Posts Rated:
231231
edit: No profanity in the forums please. Thanks.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 5/17/2009 4:23:50 PM

This Post:
00
90007.46 in reply to 90007.45
Date: 5/17/2009 3:39:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
In my series, 3 teams tried to get placed as 6th. Because of this someone team which was clearly the worst ended as number 7. And those two teams pushed my team and another team respectively to place 5 and 4, while they're teams were much better. And it actually seems to be a lot better to finish as number 7 than number 5.

Last edited by Arsjitekt at 5/17/2009 3:40:20 PM

From: ned
This Post:
00
90007.47 in reply to 90007.46
Date: 5/17/2009 3:51:57 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Fully quote the proposal to play a game between the teams classified in 5 position, this can guarantee a minimum amount.

5 position =

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
90007.48 in reply to 90007.47
Date: 5/17/2009 5:42:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
there was the same problem in my div :) because in the other side in the table 7th place is bot :) ( maybe guy got ban or smth I don't care) so there was three teams who wanted 6th place and that bot in qualifications. so in the end of the season we lost as many games as we could :) so I got that 6th place I am much happier than that guy in 5th place It is fact

This Post:
00
90007.49 in reply to 90007.48
Date: 5/17/2009 6:08:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I guess some of you are overlooking the purpose of relative benefits for 6th-7th places - faciliating the process of closing the gap between newer/weaker teams and original/traditional powerhouses in particular countries. The game needs to be open this way to make contending possible over a time. BB is a strategic game - feel free to use what rules give you to rise to the top. It is up to you how. If you want to take the risk sometimes, do it but nothing is guaranteed (including badly executed tanking and ending at 5th "the most horrible it-has-to-be-changed" place).

This Post:
00
90007.51 in reply to 90007.50
Date: 5/17/2009 7:29:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
What if instead of being safe from relegation, the 5th place team plays the 8th place team in the other bracket and the loser being relegated? I also think it would be interesting to see a crossover in the playoffs, so that if the 2 best teams are in the same division, they will have a chance to meet each other in the finals instead of meeting in the semifinals.

This Post:
00
90007.52 in reply to 90007.51
Date: 5/17/2009 8:16:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Wha if nobody would make the play offs just 1st would play 8th, 2nd .. you got the point. Let just play regular season for a reason (other than draft order).

This Post:
00
90007.53 in reply to 90007.51
Date: 5/18/2009 5:59:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
What if instead of being safe from relegation, the 5th place team plays the 8th place team in the other bracket and the loser being relegated? I also think it would be interesting to see a crossover in the playoffs, so that if the 2 best teams are in the same division, they will have a chance to meet each other in the finals instead of meeting in the semifinals.


in this case the ywill argue, if 5/6 place better then 3/4th :)

If you look at the "average" income of those teams, the answer is pretty easy even if i win the first PO round away(like me last season), i earn just a small part of the money a six placed team get.

From the point of money, i don't like the final of the season anyway. For example me as a first round looser, will get around ~130k. The one who wins a 3 round relegation will get 600-700k.

The champion will have earned something around 1,2 Miollions, which is a huge advantage against the 3-5th team. And in the season the income differs a lot too, so i hard the top teams

Advertisement