BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S22

BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S22

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
232153.44 in reply to 232153.43
Date: 12/6/2012 9:55:49 AM
Nitra Corgons
Extraliga
Overall Posts Rated:
989989
Second Team:
Nitra Urpiners
common guys patient with guard on c spot doesnt work almost at all.. it either work when u r better than opponent or when your opponent has really low OD. no matter what skills your guard on C spot has he still ends with 30-40% accuracy. only chance to win is really via 3pts. so have C with 7+ OD and u r safe.

1 BBB, 20 Leagues, 10 Tournaments, 3 Europe Titles (SVK), 2 World Bronzes (SVK), 2 Europe Bronzes (SVK,FRA), 42 Seasons NT coaching
This Post:
00
232153.45 in reply to 232153.35
Date: 12/6/2012 10:34:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
244244
It does add some variety, that's good. I personally am a fan of the good ol' fashioned Base Offense :)

From: brian

This Post:
00
232153.46 in reply to 232153.44
Date: 12/6/2012 10:45:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
common guys patient with guard on c spot doesnt work almost at all.


depends on the case. it might be true in that tehran had better options (maybe not, only he really knows) and only won mostly because he was a better team, but he did win against a good opponent so the tactic was somewhat successful.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Greedy

This Post:
00
232153.47 in reply to 232153.43
Date: 12/6/2012 12:02:22 PM
Manila Bombers
PPL
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
By this method then though the better teams should win out...but in general teams in the upper end of the middle of the pack woudl get less overall wins, right??? Like the better the team, logically the tougher competition they would face overall...meaning less wins....
the spread of win-loss would be less drastic in teh middle right????


Yes, that is why I think having this type of tournament is good. The best teams win out at the cost of the upper middle teams losing a little. But I think it is a good tradeoff. :) So off we go to the suggestion forums? (232503.1)

This Post:
00
232153.48 in reply to 232153.37
Date: 12/6/2012 12:16:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
245245
if i am not wrong his js was something like 6 and jr 5.

This Post:
22
232153.49 in reply to 232153.40
Date: 12/6/2012 2:58:58 PM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
Interesting, thx for the work, he made a nice win anyway, not a lot managers would decide to play on that way.

This is where we hold them!
This Post:
00
232153.50 in reply to 232153.48
Date: 12/6/2012 5:01:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Ah, that explains his listing as a C. Somebody before me said he has high JS. So he must have higher C skills to compensate for lower JS to reach that salary.

This Post:
00
232153.53 in reply to 232153.50
Date: 12/7/2012 5:18:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
373373
Раtient did not help Tegeran a lot . I think he would score more with any other tactic . The problem was my offence - maybe due to respectable form . Plus too many turnovers - less posessions.

This Post:
11
232153.54 in reply to 232153.53
Date: 12/7/2012 6:27:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I don't think so. Which tactic would make him score more? I don't think he has enough firepower to run a decent Look inside offense. Also LI would give you more possessions, while Patient gave you less since it's so slow.

Advertisement