BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67212.44 in reply to 67212.43
Date: 1/6/2009 10:17:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
we asked a training 50-50% ID-OD
This should be out of question. Next step would be this type of training for every position because you could make an allaround defensive team by training them at SF spot using this training. And it would cause a riot from Run and Gun teams arguing they low FG% and 3PT% even more.

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.45 in reply to 67212.44
Date: 1/6/2009 10:22:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
What!? Trying to digest your jump to conclusions just about gave me vertigo.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
67212.47 in reply to 67212.46
Date: 1/6/2009 11:39:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
All around players should be hard to train... so keep the SF training as it is. Otherwise give single spot training to every position in every skill simple!!!

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
67212.49 in reply to 67212.48
Date: 1/6/2009 11:46:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
But they will be easier to train than they are now...

From: Iordanou

This Post:
00
67212.50 in reply to 67212.48
Date: 1/6/2009 11:50:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I think that nothing has to be changed on training options, because I thinked about them slightly and I think that they are well-ballanced.

I will always have an dilema almost everytime I will switch the training and that is a best way. In my humble opinion.

This Post:
00
67212.51 in reply to 67212.46
Date: 1/6/2009 11:55:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I believe SF need a change in training. Right now is too hard to train SF.


Then I must be the luckiest man in BB, even with my old trainees, I manage to train my SFs quite good, and I don't find it hard at all.

Thanks for making me feel better.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
67212.52 in reply to 67212.48
Date: 1/6/2009 11:56:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Today we train the wards C / PF and PG / SG, including the players who should make SF. If we give an identity to SF realize just more difficult to maintain the other departments at high (because you like the difficulty), then increase even more the value of SF since it will only managers who want to really dedicate themselves to coach them.

This Post:
00
67212.53 in reply to 67212.50
Date: 1/6/2009 12:01:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I have to continue - only thing which I would like to see in the training is an option for the training PG/SG/SF Passing at once. That would be really kind thing from developers, while it would be faster only for a 1/4 than a team training, but I guess that 3-phase training is normally somehow faster for a 1/4.

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.54 in reply to 67212.47
Date: 1/6/2009 12:18:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
You can already single position train every other position in something (except PF, which are nicely bundled with center anyways).

Why should SF be excluded?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Advertisement